Etter v. Armstrong
42 Ind. 475
This text of 42 Ind. 475 (Etter v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Etter v. Armstrong, 42 Ind. 475 (Ind. 1873).
Opinion
The appellants have not complied with rule 19 of this court, 32 Ind., in making marginal notes on the transcript. It is of great if not absolute necessity that this rule should be complied with, to assist the judges and facilitate business in this court, which is overwhelmed with cases and labor.
The submission is set aside, at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 Ind. 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/etter-v-armstrong-ind-1873.