Etter v. Armstrong
42 Ind. 475
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Etter v. Armstrong. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 Ind. 197 →
Opinion
The appellants have not complied with rule 19 of this court, 32 Ind., in making marginal notes on the transcript. It is of great if not absolute necessity that this rule should be complied with, to assist the judges and facilitate business in this court, which is overwhelmed with cases and labor.
The submission is set aside, at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Etter v. Armstrong, 42 Ind. 475 (Ind. 1873).
42 Ind. 475 (Etter v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.