Bingham v. Elmore
This text of 52 Ind. 252 (Bingham v. Elmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question submitted for our decision in this case is as to the correctness of an instruction given by the court.
Counsel for the appellee, who was the defendant below, contend that the instruction is not properly in the record, and that therefore the question is not before us. The instruction is not in any bill of exceptions, nor is it signed by the judge or by the attorneys of the defendant. There is this entry at the bottom of it: “ Given and excepted to,” signed by the attorney of the plaintiff.
We think the instruction is not properly in the record. The Jeffersonville, etc., R. R. Co. v. Cox, 37 Ind. 325; Etter v. Armstrong, 46 Ind. 197.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 Ind. 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bingham-v-elmore-ind-1875.