Estey v. Burdett

109 U.S. 633, 3 S. Ct. 531, 27 L. Ed. 1058, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1738
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 7, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 109 U.S. 633 (Estey v. Burdett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estey v. Burdett, 109 U.S. 633, 3 S. Ct. 531, 27 L. Ed. 1058, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1738 (1884).

Opinion

Hr. Justice Blatchford

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit in'equity brought for the infringement of letters patent No. 87,241, .granted February 23d, ,1869, to Biley Burdett, the plaintiff, for 17 years from August 24th, 1868, for an improvement in reed organs.” The specification of the patent is in these words: • '

*634 “Figure 1 is aiperspective view of one of my reed celeste organs. Figure 2 is a diagram plan, showing the relative arrangement of the reeds. Figure 3 is a vertical transverse section of my reed-boards, &c. This invention consists, first, in the arrangement of the reed-board ; second, in a method of tuning, by which a peculiar quality of tone' is produced, and by which the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R. K. Le Blond Mach. Tool Co. v. Wickes Bros.
23 F. Supp. 371 (E.D. Michigan, 1937)
Eclipse MacH. Co. v. J. H. Specialty Mfg. Co.
4 F. Supp. 306 (E.D. New York, 1933)
Handel Co. v. Jefferson Glass Co.
265 F. 286 (N.D. West Virginia, 1920)
Tiffany v. Paper Products Co.
244 F. 178 (N.D. Georgia, 1917)
Ex Parte National Enameling and Stamping Company
201 U.S. 156 (Supreme Court, 1906)
Sampson v. Donaldson
69 F. 621 (Eighth Circuit, 1895)
Simonds Manuf'g Co. v. E. C. Atkins & Co.
63 F. 584 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1894)
Stirrat v. Excelsior Manuf'g Co.
61 F. 980 (Eighth Circuit, 1894)
Bonnell v. Stoll
61 F. 767 (Third Circuit, 1894)
Bonnell v. Stoll
57 F. 396 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey, 1893)
Grant v. Walker
148 U.S. 547 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Grant v. Walter
38 F. 594 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1889)
Wright v. Yuengling
33 F. 655 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1888)
Cluett v. Claflin
30 F. 921 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1887)
Leonard v. Lovell
29 F. 310 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan, 1886)
Pomace Holder Co. v. Ferguson
119 U.S. 335 (Supreme Court, 1886)
Thompson v. Boisselier
114 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1885)
Burdett v. Estey
4 F. Cas. 712 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 U.S. 633, 3 S. Ct. 531, 27 L. Ed. 1058, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estey-v-burdett-scotus-1884.