Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian Authority

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 3, 2015
DocketCivil Action No. 2004-1173
StatusPublished

This text of Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian Authority (Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian Authority, (D.D.C. 2015).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________________ ) ESTATE OF ESTHER KLIEMAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1173 (PLF) ) PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )

ORDER

Upon consideration of defendants Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation

Organization’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion [Dkt. No. 282] for admission pro hac vice of Gassan

A. Baloul is DENIED. If Mr. Baloul practices law from an office located in the District of

Columbia, he must either be a member of the District of Columbia Bar or have an application

pending. See Local Civil Rule 83.2(d)(6). Otherwise, he is engaged in the unauthorized practice

of law. See DCCA Rule 49.

/s/________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN DATE: March 3, 2015 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian Authority, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-esther-klieman-v-palestinian-authority-dcd-2015.