EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK, Appellee

680 F.2d 965, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19154, 29 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,720, 30 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 906
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 18, 1982·No. 79-1533·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

ORDER

The appellee’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc has been considered by the court.

The panel considered the petition for rehearing and decided, Judge Russell dissenting, that it should be and it is denied.

On a poll of the court on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, the court was evenly divided. Because a majority of the judges in regular active service did not vote in favor of rehearing en banc, that suggestion in motion is denied. From this denial, Judge Russell, Judge Widener, Judge Hall, Judge Ervin and Judge Chapman dissent, and Judge Widener has filed a dissenting opinion in which Judge Russell joins.

Entered at the direction of Judge Phillips.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK, Appellee, 680 F.2d 965, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19154, 29 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,720, 30 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 906 (4th Cir. 1982).

680 F.2d 965 (EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK, Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related