Enrique Godoy v. Marion Spearman

Ninth Circuit

Enrique Godoy v. Marion Spearman

855 F.3d 985, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3764, 2017 WL 816885

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 2, 2017

Docket13-56024

StatusPublished

This text of 855 F.3d 985 (Enrique Godoy v. Marion Spearman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Enrique Godoy v. Marion Spearman, 855 F.3d 985, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3764, 2017 WL 816885 (9th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Graber did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Graber did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

855 F.3d 985, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3764, 2017 WL 816885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enrique-godoy-v-marion-spearman-ca9-2017.