Home/Ninth Circuit/Enrique Godoy v. Marion Spearman

Enrique Godoy v. Marion Spearman

855 F.3d 985, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3764, 2017 WL 816885
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Enrique Godoy v. Marion Spearman. Read the opinion of the Court — 861 F.3d 956 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 2, 2017·No. 13-56024·Published

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Graber did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Enrique Godoy v. Marion Spearman, 855 F.3d 985, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3764, 2017 WL 816885 (9th Cir. 2017).

855 F.3d 985 (Enrique Godoy v. Marion Spearman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.