Enmund v. Florida
455 U.S. 937, 102 S. Ct. 1425, 71 L. Ed. 2d 647, 50 U.S.L.W. 3668, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 811
This text of 455 U.S. 937 (Enmund v. Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Enmund v. Florida, 455 U.S. 937, 102 S. Ct. 1425, 71 L. Ed. 2d 647, 50 U.S.L.W. 3668, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 811 (1982).
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Fla. [Certiorari granted, 454 U. S. 939.] Motion of George R. Georgieff to permit Lawrence A. Kaden, Esquire, to present oral argument pro hac vice granted. Motion of William C. McLain to permit James S. Liebman, Esquire, to present oral argument pro hac vice granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
455 U.S. 937, 102 S. Ct. 1425, 71 L. Ed. 2d 647, 50 U.S.L.W. 3668, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enmund-v-florida-scotus-1982.