English v. Cunningham

282 F.2d 839, 108 U.S. App. D.C. 356, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4290
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 14, 1960
DocketNo. 15467
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 282 F.2d 839 (English v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
English v. Cunningham, 282 F.2d 839, 108 U.S. App. D.C. 356, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4290 (D.C. Cir. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on for consideration on the original record and was argued by counsel.

Being of opinion that the order of the District Court of December 7, 1959, authorizing the Board of Monitors to utilize all necessary discovery processes to examine all persons who may have knowledge concerning the Sun Valley Transaction, the Commercial State Bank and Trust Company of New York Transaction and the Fidelity Bank Transaction, contained in an Interim Report of the Board of Monitors, provided the Board of Monitors obtain approval of the District Court prior to instituting any of the above discovery procedures, and provided the Board of Monitors upon completion of the discovery processes render a comprehensive report to the District Court on its findings, is an order which in context is not final or appealable under the Judicial Code, it is

Ordered by the court that the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 F.2d 839, 108 U.S. App. D.C. 356, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/english-v-cunningham-cadc-1960.