English v. Cunningham

282 F.2d 838, 108 U.S. App. D.C. 355

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in English v. Cunningham. Read the opinion of the Court — 282 F.2d 839 →

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 14, 1960·No. No. 15339·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the oral argument on the motion to vacate stay, of the briefs of the parties and of the memoranda and the report of the Board of Monitors relative to the use of counsel, it is

Ordered by the court that the order of the District Court of July 23, 1959, authorizing the engagement of the services of a firm of lawyers to assist the Board of Monitors, is affirmed with the modification that the Board of Monitors may engage the professional services of said firm of lawyers to assist them in litigation prudently and reasonably deemed by the Board of Monitors to be required in the performance of the duties of the Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the oral argument on the motion to vacate stay, of the briefs of the parties and of the memoranda and the report of the Board of Monitors relative to the use of counsel, it is

English v. Cunningham, 282 F.2d 838, 108 U.S. App. D.C. 355 (D.C. Cir. 1960).

Pincite

282 F.2d 838 (English v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.