Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Irving Place Associates, Inc.

622 P.2d 784, 1980 Utah LEXIS 1091
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 17, 1980
Docket16895
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 622 P.2d 784 (Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Irving Place Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Irving Place Associates, Inc., 622 P.2d 784, 1980 Utah LEXIS 1091 (Utah 1980).

Opinion

HARDING, District Judge:

This case was submitted to the trial court upon a stipulation, with argument by counsel. The court found in favor of the plaintiff on its complaint, and in favor of the respondent on its cross-complaint against the appellant. The judgment for the plaintiff is not an issue in this appeal. We are concerned only with the claims of respondent and appellant against each other. Irving Place Associates, Inc., respondent herein, was engaged in converting the old Irving Jr. High School in Salt Lake City to an office complex. It sought financing through appellant, USLIFE Real Estate Services Corporation. Under date of January 24,1975, it made an application through appellant for a mortgage loan commitment of $1,000,000 from one of appellant’s affiliates. The commitment fee was $30,000. The application was later amended to request a loan of $1,100,000, and presumably a commitment fee of $33,000. The pertinent parts of the application are as follows:

DATE: January 24, 1975
TO: A USLIFE Corporation affiliate (to be named)
SUBJECT: Standby First Mortgage Gentlemen:
We hereby make an application for a mortgage loan to the above-named company (hereinafter called Lender) upon the terms and conditions incorporated herein by reference.
Location of Property: 1177 East 2100 South Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106
Size of Plot: 5.5 acres.
Borrower: (Applicant): A corporation to be formed, with the following individuals as stockholders: Ronald Winegar, Terry Reid, William A. Richardson and M. Keith Richardson.
Type of Property: Existing high school to be remodeled with modern office space —61,000 net rentable square feet.
Loan Amount: $1,000,000
Interest Rate: 16% Annual Constant:
18% Term : Five years
Commitment Term : 18 months
Commitment Fee: $30,000 — One point to be returned if liability is terminated during the first 12 months.
We find these basic terms acceptable to us, and so indicate below. Enclosed is our certified or cashier’s check representing a good faith deposit of $10,000 payable to your company or order.
Should one of your life insurance company affiliates agree to issue a standby first mortgage commitment, the funds will be delivered to said affiliate as part pay *786 ment of the commitment fee referred to above, the total of which shall at that time be considered earned by one of your life insurance company affiliates. In the event you are unable to secure from one of your life insurance company affiliates a commitment containing the foregoing terms, the good faith deposit shall be returned immediately.
ACCEPTED BY: Ronald R. Winegar VP Irving Place Assoc. Inc.
DATED: 2-7-75

There was attached to the application a document entitled Schedule “A,” which contained detailed provisions with respect to the requested loan. One of the provisions related to the commitment fee, and is as follows:

32. Commitment Fee: In consideration of your acceptance of this application, by which it will be converted into a formal loan commitment, we agree to pay you a fee in the amount of $30,000, which shall in no event whatsoever be refunded, and which shall be deemed earned at the time of your acceptance of this Application. Previously submitted, Due $10,000 with application, $20,000 upon issuance of commitment.

The response to respondent’s application was a letter, dated March 6, 1975, from All American Life and Casualty Company, an affiliate of appellant, which is as follows: To Irving Place Associates, Inc.

Attn: Mr. Greg C. Johnson
Re: AAL Commitment No. 873 Standby First Mortgage
Gentlemen:
We hereby offer to make a first mortgage loan as provided in and subject to the conditions of the attached Schedule A, which is incorporated herein and made a part hereof as if fully set forth at this point.
Please return to the undersigned on or before March 20, 1975, two executed copies of this Commitment Letter, accompanied by your check in the amount of $23,000.00. Upon our timely receipt of the foregoing and our execution of both copies of this letter by the Chairman of the Board or and [sic] executive officer, this shall become a binding agreement between us. One fully executed copy of this letter will be returned to you. Should you fail to return and execute this letter within the period hereinbefore specified, this offer shall become void. [Emphasis added.]
This agreement may not be changed orally. The terms and conditions hereof will survive the closing of this proposed loan. All prior representations and agreements between the parties are merged in this agreement.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely yours,
M. C. McLain, J.D.
Counsel
AAL Commitment No. 873
March 6, 1975
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:
IRVING PLACE ASSOCIATES, INC.
BY: Ronald R. Winegar V. Pres.
Date: 3-18-75
We hereby acknowledge receipt of the Commitment Fee in the amount of $33,-000, subject to collection, and hereby agree that the Commitment is now in full force and effect.
ALL AMERICAN LIFE & CASUALTY COMPANY

On March 18, 1975, respondent accepted in writing the conditions specified in Schedule “A” attached to the March 6th letter. The check for $23,000, required by the letter, was not sent. All American Life and Casualty Company did not sign the letter to signify the making of a loan commitment to respondent. No binding mortgage loan commitment ever came into existence.

The documents set forth herein were drafted by the appellant.

On December 17, 1975, respondent requested the return of its $10,000 deposit from the appellant if no further efforts were to be made to secure a mortgage loan commitment. On December 24,1975, appellant stated it would no longer seek a loan *787 commitment for respondent. It declined to return the deposit on the grounds that the deposit had been earned by it.

The court gave respondent a judgment against the appellant for a return of the deposit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bird v. Wardley
D. Utah, 2019
Lebrecht v. Deep Blue Pools & Spas Inc.
2016 UT App 110 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2016)
Soundvision Technologies, LLC v. Templeton Group Ltd.
929 F. Supp. 2d 1174 (D. Utah, 2013)
Anderson v. Larry H. Miller Communications Corp.
2012 UT App 196 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2012)
Cea v. Hoffman
2012 UT App 101 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2012)
McKelvey v. Hamilton
2009 UT App 126 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2009)
1-800 CONTACTS, INC. v. Weigner
2005 UT App 523 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2005)
Nunley v. Westates Casing Services, Inc.
1999 UT 100 (Utah Supreme Court, 1999)
Triax Pacific, Inc. v. American Ins. Co.
69 F.3d 548 (Tenth Circuit, 1995)
Cal Wadsworth Construction v. City of St. George
898 P.2d 1372 (Utah Supreme Court, 1995)
Bourque v. FDIC
First Circuit, 1994
Bourque v. Federal Deposit Insurance
42 F.3d 704 (First Circuit, 1994)
Sparrow v. Tayco Construction Co.
846 P.2d 1323 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 P.2d 784, 1980 Utah LEXIS 1091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engineering-associates-inc-v-irving-place-associates-inc-utah-1980.