Empire Asset Management Company v. Best

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 29, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-04542·Unknown

Opinion

: LIMO SHIN a ueteae ween i DA Uti □ □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | ELECTRONICALLY □□□□□ | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Doc # EMPIRE ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY, HOATE PILED: □□□□ | . a □□□□□□ I Petitioner, -against- 21 CIVIL 4542 (PAC) JUDGMENT JOSEPH BEST, Respondent. wenn nen nee nnn XK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated June 28, 2021, Defendant’s motion is granted. Under Katz v. Cellco Partnership, 794 F.3d 341 (2d Cir. 2015), a district court must stay judicial proceedings pending arbitration "after all claims have been referred to arbitration and a stay [is] requested." Id. at 345. Here, however, neither party requests a stay of the judicial proceedings; instead, Empire requests only a stay of the underlying arbitration proceedings. Accordingly, because neither party has requested a stay of the federal action, Katz is inapplicable and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York June 29, 202]

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: Deputy Ww)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Empire Asset Management Company v. Best, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Empire Asset Management Company v. Best (Empire Asset Management Company v. Best) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Katz v. Cellco Partnership
794 F.3d 341 (Second Circuit, 2015)