Ember v. B.F.D., Inc.
This text of 521 N.E.2d 981 (Ember v. B.F.D., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON REHEARING
As author of Ember v. B.F.D., Inc. (1986), Ind.App., 490 N.E.2d 764, I would modify the opinion by omitting that part which states that "we ground our reversal of the summary judgment solely on the basis of the failure to take into account the possible assumption of a gratuitous duty to protect persons outside the Pub's premises...." id. at T71. Also, I would ground our reversal of the summary judgment on those authorities discussed in the opinion which support additional bases of possible liability, to wit, premises liability, dangerous activity, and nuisance. Judge Shields, however, stands on the opinion as written.
Rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
521 N.E.2d 981, 1988 Ind. App. LEXIS 346, 1988 WL 35822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ember-v-bfd-inc-indctapp-1988.