Ellis v. State

762 So. 2d 912, 2000 WL 889788
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 6, 2000
DocketSC96551
StatusPublished
Cited by102 cases

This text of 762 So. 2d 912 (Ellis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellis v. State, 762 So. 2d 912, 2000 WL 889788 (Fla. 2000).

Opinion

762 So.2d 912 (2000)

John W. ELLIS, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. SC96551.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 6, 2000.

Mark A. Gruwell, Sarasota, Florida, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and John M. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Ellis v. State, 740 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), in which the Second District certified conflict with Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently approved the First District's decision in Woods, holding that the Prisoner Releasee Reoffender Act, as properly interpreted by the First District, does not violate separation of powers, and rejecting other constitutional challenges to the Act. See State v. Cotton, Nos. SC94996 & SC95281, ___ So.2d ___, 2000 WL 766521 (Fla. June 15, 2000). Accordingly, for the reasons expressed in Cotton, we quash the Second District's decision in this case to the extent that it may be interpreted as construing the Act in a manner which is inconsistent with our decision in Cotton. We approve the Second District's rejection of petitioner's challenge to the Act based upon the lack of a statutory notice requirement. See State v. Beasley, 580 So.2d 139, 142 (Fla.1991) (observing that, "[a]s to notice, publication in the Laws of Florida or the Florida Statutes gives all citizens constructive notice of the consequences of their actions"). We decline to address the other issues raised in this case. See Heuss v. State, 687 So.2d 823, 824 (Fla.1996).

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

QUINCE, J., dissents with an opinion.

QUINCE, J., dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in State v. Cotton, Nos. SC94996 & SC95281, ___ So.2d ___, 2000 WL 766521 (Fla. June 15, 2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ELIJAH BOWDEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
GARRETT WORTH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
ISIAH TURNER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Tucker v. State
206 So. 3d 87 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Neff v. State
204 So. 3d 520 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Copeland v. State
197 So. 3d 626 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Harris v. State
197 So. 3d 630 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Flint v. State
13 So. 3d 70 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
JIS v. State
930 So. 2d 587 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
American Home Assur. v. PLAZA MATERIALS
908 So. 2d 360 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Knight v. State
808 So. 2d 210 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Brooks v. State
790 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Melton v. State
789 So. 2d 1204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Kirkendall v. State
789 So. 2d 513 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Robinson v. State
793 So. 2d 891 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Campbell v. State
790 So. 2d 1090 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Smith v. State
793 So. 2d 889 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Sheffield v. State
26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 450 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Chambers v. State
789 So. 2d 336 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Aguayo v. State
789 So. 2d 337 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
762 So. 2d 912, 2000 WL 889788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-state-fla-2000.