Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Melton v. State

Melton v. State

783 So. 2d 325, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4709, 2001 WL 356321
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 11, 2001
DocketNo. 4D01-639
StatusPublished

This text of 783 So. 2d 325 (Melton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melton v. State, 783 So. 2d 325, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4709, 2001 WL 356321 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s filing a legally sufficient motion at the conclusion of his appeal. See Catis v. State, 741 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 735 So.2d 1284 (1999)(citing Vento v. State, 621 So.2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), 3.850 motion legally insufficient where defendant failed to provide sufficient facts supporting his claim of ineffectiveness).

STONE, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Catis v. State
741 So. 2d 1140 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Vento v. State
621 So. 2d 493 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
783 So. 2d 325, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4709, 2001 WL 356321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melton-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.