Melton v. State
783 So. 2d 325, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4709, 2001 WL 356321
Opinion
Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s filing a legally sufficient motion at the conclusion of his appeal. See Catis v. State, 741 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 735 So.2d 1284 (1999)(citing Vento v. State, 621 So.2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), 3.850 motion legally insufficient where defendant failed to provide sufficient facts supporting his claim of ineffectiveness).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Melton v. State, 783 So. 2d 325, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4709, 2001 WL 356321 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
783 So. 2d 325 (Melton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Catis v. State
741 So. 2d 1140 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Vento v. State
621 So. 2d 493 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)