Kirkendall v. State

789 So. 2d 513, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9703, 2001 WL 788339
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 13, 2001·No. No. 2D99-227·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court. In accordance with the mandate, we remand this case to the trial court for reconsideration of sentencing in light of the Florida Supreme Court’s decisions, if appropriate, in Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So.2d 1039 (Fla.2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So.2d 912 (Fla.2000).

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and GREEN and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkendall v. State, 789 So. 2d 513, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9703, 2001 WL 788339 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

789 So. 2d 513 (Kirkendall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. State
789 So. 2d 513 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)