Kirkendall v. State

789 So. 2d 513, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9703, 2001 WL 788339
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 13, 2001
DocketNo. 2D99-227
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 789 So. 2d 513 (Kirkendall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirkendall v. State, 789 So. 2d 513, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9703, 2001 WL 788339 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court. In accordance with the mandate, we remand this case to the trial court for reconsideration of sentencing in light of the Florida Supreme Court’s decisions, if appropriate, in Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So.2d 1039 (Fla.2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So.2d 912 (Fla.2000).

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and GREEN and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. State
789 So. 2d 513 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
789 So. 2d 513, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9703, 2001 WL 788339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkendall-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.