Home/Fourth Circuit/Elliott v. Leavitt

Elliott v. Leavitt

105 F.3d 174
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 1997
DocketNos. 96-1150, 96-1151
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 105 F.3d 174 (Elliott v. Leavitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elliott v. Leavitt, 105 F.3d 174 (4th Cir. 1997).

Opinions

ORDER

A member of the Court requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en bane. [175]*175A majority of the judges in active service voted that it should not be reheard en banc.

Judges Hall, Murnaghan, Ervin, Michael, and Motz voted for rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Wilkinson, and Judges Russell, Widener, Wilkins, Niemeyer, Hamilton, Luttig, and Williams voted against rehearing en banc.

Chief Judge Wilkinson filed an opinion concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc, in which Judges Russell, Widener, Wilkins, Niemeyer, Luttig, and Williams joined. Judge Motz filed an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, in which Judges Hall, Murnaghan, Ervin, and Michael joined.

The suggestion for rehearing en banc is hereby denied. Entered at the direction of Chief Judge Wilkinson for the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Candido Romo v. Jeff Largen
723 F.3d 670 (Sixth Circuit, 2013)
Vandevander v. Voorhaar
767 A.2d 339 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Richards v. Ferrebee
Fourth Circuit, 1999
In Re Barbara H. Allen, Better Government Bureau, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation v. Darrell v. McGraw Jr., Attorney General, State of West Virginia, Personally and in His Official Capacity Better Government Bureau Office of the Attorney General State of West Virginia, a Body Politic, a Corporate Instrumentality of Government With Limited Agency and Quasisovereign Capacity Ken Hechler, Secretary of State, in His Official Capacity v. Donna Willis, Party in Interest. Better Government Bureau, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation v. Darrell v. McGraw Jr., Attorney General, State of West Virginia, Personally and in His Official Capacity, and Better Government Bureau Office of the Attorney General State of West Virginia, a Body Politic, a Corporate Instrumentality of Government With Limited Agency and Quasi-Sovereign Capacity Ken Hechler, Secretary of State, in His Official Capacity v. Barbara H. Allen Donna Willis, Parties in Interest. (Two Cases)
119 F.3d 1129 (Fourth Circuit, 1997)
In re: Allen v.
Fourth Circuit, 1997
Better Government Bureau, Inc. v. McGraw
119 F.3d 1129 (Fourth Circuit, 1997)
Dorothy C. Elliott, Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III Archie Elliott, Jr., Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III v. Jason Leavitt, Police Officer for District Heights, Md, and Prince George's County, Maryland David B. Mitchell, Prince George's County Police Chief Wayne Cheney, Police Officer City of District Heights, Md Michael Conboy, Police Chief for District Heights, Md, Dorothy C. Elliott, Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III Archie Elliott, Jr., Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III v. Wayne Cheney, Police Officer, and Jason Leavitt, Police Officer for District Heights, Md Prince George's County, Maryland David B. Mitchell, Prince George's County Police Chief City of District Heights, Md Michael Conboy, Police Chief for District Heights, Md
105 F.3d 174 (Fourth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 F.3d 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-leavitt-ca4-1997.