Eli Lilly & Co. v. United States

372 F.2d 990, 178 Ct. Cl. 666
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedFebruary 17, 1967
DocketNo. 293-61
StatusPublished
Cited by59 cases

This text of 372 F.2d 990 (Eli Lilly & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eli Lilly & Co. v. United States, 372 F.2d 990, 178 Ct. Cl. 666 (cc 1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Lloyd Fletcher with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on September 20, 1965. Exceptions to the commissioner’s report, findings and recommended conclusion of law were filed by plaintiff and defendant excepted to a statement in the commissioner’s opinion. The case has been submitted to the court on oral argument of counsel and the briefs of the parties. Since the court is in agreement with the opinion, findings and recommendation of the commissioner, with modifications, it hereby adopts the same, as modified, as the basis for its judgment in this case, as hereinafter set forth. Plaintiff is therefore not entitled to recover end the petition is dismissed on its petition filed on July 26,1961, and the case is remanded to the trial commissioner for further proceedings on plaintiff’s motion to amend the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

William Cavallaro, Donor v. Commissioner
2019 T.C. Memo. 144 (U.S. Tax Court, 2019)
H Group Holding, Inc. v. Commissioner
1999 T.C. Memo. 334 (U.S. Tax Court, 1999)
GAC Produce Co. v. Commissioner
1999 T.C. Memo. 134 (U.S. Tax Court, 1999)
Dhl Corp. v. Comm'r
1998 T.C. Memo. 461 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Kenco Restaurants, Inc. v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 342 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Podd v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 231 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Larsen v. United States
39 Fed. Cl. 162 (Federal Claims, 1997)
International Paper Co. v. United States
36 Fed. Cl. 313 (Federal Claims, 1996)
InverWorld v. Commissioner
1996 T.C. Memo. 301 (U.S. Tax Court, 1996)
Arrington v. United States
34 Fed. Cl. 144 (Federal Claims, 1995)
Clayton v. United States
33 Fed. Cl. 628 (Federal Claims, 1995)
Altama Delta Corp. v. Commissioner
104 T.C. No. 22 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
Apollo Computer, Inc. v. United States
32 Fed. Cl. 334 (Federal Claims, 1994)
Seagate Technology v. Commissioner
102 T.C. No. 9 (U.S. Tax Court, 1994)
Sara Lee Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United States
29 Fed. Cl. 330 (Federal Claims, 1993)
Hearst Corp. v. United States
28 Fed. Cl. 202 (Federal Claims, 1993)
Merck & Co. v. United States
24 Cl. Ct. 73 (Court of Claims, 1991)
Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner
96 T.C. No. 12 (U.S. Tax Court, 1991)
Krapf v. United States
17 Cl. Ct. 750 (Court of Claims, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 F.2d 990, 178 Ct. Cl. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eli-lilly-co-v-united-states-cc-1967.