Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.

158 A.2d 528, 31 N.J. 591
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 7, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 158 A.2d 528 (Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc., 158 A.2d 528, 31 N.J. 591 (N.J. 1960).

Opinion

31 N.J. 591 (1960)
158 A.2d 528

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SAV-ON-DRUGS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 22, 1960.
Decided March 7, 1960.

Mr. Melvin P. Antell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Lorentz & Stamler, attorneys).

Mr. Warren E. Dunn argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys; Mr. Claus Motulsky, of the New York bar, on the brief).

Mr. Murry Brochin argued the cause for the State of New Jersey, intervenor (Mr. David D. Furman, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Scherer in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO — 6.

For reversal — Justice HALL — 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ringgold Coal Mining Co. v. Taxation Division Director
4 N.J. Tax 321 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1982)
Max Factor & Co. v. Park Row Cut Rate
193 F. Supp. 462 (S.D. New York, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.2d 528, 31 N.J. 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eli-lilly-co-v-sav-on-drugs-inc-nj-1960.