Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.

158 A.2d 528, 31 N.J. 591
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 7, 1960·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

31 N.J. 591 (1960)
158 A.2d 528

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SAV-ON-DRUGS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 22, 1960.
Decided March 7, 1960.

Mr. Melvin P. Antell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Lorentz & Stamler, attorneys).

Mr. Warren E. Dunn argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys; Mr. Claus Motulsky, of the New York bar, on the brief).

Mr. Murry Brochin argued the cause for the State of New Jersey, intervenor (Mr. David D. Furman, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Scherer in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO — 6.

For reversal — Justice HALL — 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc., 158 A.2d 528, 31 N.J. 591 (N.J. 1960).

158 A.2d 528 (Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ringgold Coal Mining Co. v. Taxation Division Director
4 N.J. Tax 321 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1982)
Max Factor & Co. v. Park Row Cut Rate
193 F. Supp. 462 (S.D. New York, 1961)