Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.
Opinion
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SAV-ON-DRUGS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Melvin P. Antell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Lorentz & Stamler, attorneys).
Mr. Warren E. Dunn argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys; Mr. Claus Motulsky, of the New York bar, on the brief).
Mr. Murry Brochin argued the cause for the State of New Jersey, intervenor (Mr. David D. Furman, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Scherer in the court below.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO 6.
For reversal Justice HALL 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
158 A.2d 528 (Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.