Edwin F. Lark v. Vernon E. West, Chairman, Committee on Admissions and Grievances

289 F.2d 898
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 4, 1961
Docket15954
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 289 F.2d 898 (Edwin F. Lark v. Vernon E. West, Chairman, Committee on Admissions and Grievances) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edwin F. Lark v. Vernon E. West, Chairman, Committee on Admissions and Grievances, 289 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a member of the bar of West Virginia, sought admission to the bar of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Committee on Admissions and Grievances of that court, after affording appellant a full hearing at which he testified, and after conducting its own investigation, denied appellant admission to the bar. The Committee’s action was based on the fact that while a member of the bar of West Virginia, appellant had been convicted for mail fraud arising out of his activities as an officer of a fraternal insurance organization. Appellant served seven years of a twelve year sentence after which he received a limited pardon which operated only to restore his civil rights. The Committee’s report recited that appellant had been the principal defendant in the mail fraud case and that he received the most severe sentence of all those charged in the conspiracy. After full consideration of appellant’s evidence, including his conduct since release, the Committee unanimously voted against recommending his admission.

The Committee quite properly refused to retry the merits of appellant’s original conviction. The facts recited amply support the action of the Committee and of the District Court in denying appellant’s petition for admission to engage in the practice of law in this jurisdiction. Cf. Carver v. Clephane, 1943, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 91, 137 F.2d 685. The order of the District Court granting summary judgment for the defendants is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzales v. North Tp. of Lake County
800 F. Supp. 676 (N.D. Indiana, 1992)
Teltron, Inc. v. Alexander
132 F.R.D. 394 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1990)
In The Matter Of Judith Ward Smith
758 F.2d 1362 (Tenth Circuit, 1985)
In Re Wright
690 P.2d 1134 (Washington Supreme Court, 1984)
Matter of GLS
586 F. Supp. 375 (D. Maryland, 1984)
Brown v. McGarr
583 F. Supp. 734 (N.D. Illinois, 1984)
Galahad v. Weinshienk
555 F. Supp. 1201 (D. Colorado, 1983)
In Re Michael Rappaport
558 F.2d 87 (Second Circuit, 1977)
Bremier v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
340 F. Supp. 949 (District of Columbia, 1972)
The Washington Post Company v. Eugene J. Keogh
365 F.2d 965 (D.C. Circuit, 1966)
Feldman v. Birger
205 F. Supp. 87 (D. Massachusetts, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 F.2d 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwin-f-lark-v-vernon-e-west-chairman-committee-on-admissions-and-cadc-1961.