Edwards v. United States
This text of Edwards v. United States (Edwards v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COUN I) ECTRONICALLY BHP 4 #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Hl “ a SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PATE eon | 2l2092- | □□□ eae aay XG ~ - - ee - □ CLINT EDWARDS, Petitioner, 21 CIVIL 5978 (PMH) 18 CR. 163 (PMH) -against- JUDGMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. penne ene eee eee K
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated January 26, 2022, Petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence is DENIED and no hearing is necessary. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a Certificate of Appealability shall not be issued. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Lucidore v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 111-12 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this judgment on the merits would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Judgment is entered in favor of Respondent; accordingly, the civil case, 21cv5978, is closed. DATED: New York, New York January 26, 2022
RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: WM Gg Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edwards v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-united-states-nysd-2022.