Edwards v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 26, 2022·No. 7:21-cv-05978·Unknown

Opinion

COUN I) ECTRONICALLY BHP 4 #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Hl “ a SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PATE eon | 2l2092- | □□□ eae aay XG ~ - - ee - □ CLINT EDWARDS, Petitioner, 21 CIVIL 5978 (PMH) 18 CR. 163 (PMH) -against- JUDGMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. penne ene eee eee K

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated January 26, 2022, Petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence is DENIED and no hearing is necessary. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a Certificate of Appealability shall not be issued. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Lucidore v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 111-12 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this judgment on the merits would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Judgment is entered in favor of Respondent; accordingly, the civil case, 21cv5978, is closed. DATED: New York, New York January 26, 2022

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: WM Gg Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Edwards v. United States (Edwards v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Thomas Lucidore v. New York State Division of Parole
209 F.3d 107 (Second Circuit, 2000)