Eden v. OBERLANDER
This text of Eden v. OBERLANDER (Eden v. OBERLANDER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEFFREY EDEN : CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 21-5076 DEREK OBERLANDER, ef al. :
ORDER AND NOW, this 7" day of December 2022, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 1), the Response to the Petition (ECF Doc. No. 13), Petitioner’s Supplemental Memorandum (ECF Doc. No. 14), United States Magistrate Judge Scott W. Reid’s November 9, 2022 Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. No. 15), Petitioner’s Objections (ECF Doc. No. 16), and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED: 1. We APPROVE and ADOPT Judge Reid’s November 9, 2022 Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. No. 15); 2. We OVERRULE Petitioner’s Objections (ECF Doc. No. 16); 3. We DENY and DISMISS the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 1) with prejudice; 4, We DENY a certificate of appealability;! and, 5. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.
1 See 28 US.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eden v. OBERLANDER, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eden-v-oberlander-paed-2022.