Eddie J. Ashmore v. State of Arkansas

2024 Ark. App. 506
Court of Appeals of Arkansas·Decided October 23, 2024·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 506 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV

No. CR-24-23

Opinion Delivered October 23, 2024 EDDIE J. ASHMORE APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. 72CR-20-2574]

V.

HONORABLE MARK LINDSAY,

STATE OF ARKANSAS JUDGE APPELLEE

AFFIRMED

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge

Eddie Ashmore was charged with second-degree domestic battering, first-degree false imprisonment, and first-degree terroristic threatening for events that occurred during several days of Thanksgiving week in 2020. He was tried before a jury and convicted of all charges. The circuit court sentenced him to six years’ imprisonment for the domestic battering, three years’ imprisonment for the false imprisonment, and three years’ imprisonment for the terroristic threatening—the sentences to run consecutively. The victim of these crimes was his wife, Dorothy Ashmore.1 Eddie appeals his convictions and sentences from the court’s September 22, 2023 sentencing order. He contends that (1) the evidence was not sufficient to support his convictions and (2) the circuit court erred in sentencing him to consecutive terms of

1 Ms. Ashmore testified at trial that the parties divorced in October 2021.

imprisonment. We affirm.

I. Sufficiency of the Evidence The State’s case-in-chief included testimony by officers of the Fayetteville Police Department, Dorothy Ashmore, and the Ashmores’ adult daughter Laura, along with photos and documentation of Dorothy’s physical wounds. Eddie’s counsel moved for a directed verdict on all counts at the conclusion of the State’s case. The motion was denied. Eddie then testified in his defense, and the defense rested. His counsel renewed his directed-verdict motion. Again, the court denied the motion.

A motion for a directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.

Hughes v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 378, at 6, 467 S.W.3d 170, 174. When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we look at the evidence in the light most favorable to the State. Id. at 175. The test for determining the sufficiency of the evidence is whether the verdict is supported by substantial evidence, direct or circumstantial. Id. Evidence is substantial when it is forceful enough to compel a conclusion and goes beyond mere speculation or conjecture. Id.

Under these standards, we address the sufficiency of the evidence. Officers Jon Haden and Christian Hurd testified that they responded to a disturbance-and-mental- distress call at the Ashmores’ home the morning of November 28, 2020, the Saturday after Thanksgiving. Video footage from each officer’s body camera was played for the jury. The officers encountered Eddie outside the home; he was belligerent and antagonistic, and told them that Dorothy was delusional. Her shoes lay on the grass in the front yard, and

she agreed that she was in a delusional state. The officers noted that Dorothy’s left ring finger had blood on it and was “extremely blue-bruised,” she had a bruised elbow and “blood on her lips and the area above her nose, and her hairline on her forehead was starting to bruise” and was slightly swollen. Dorothy was in distress and did not communicate well with the officers. She denied that Eddie had caused her injuries, saying that she was very sleepy and “probably did it to myself just because.” She allowed the officers to come inside with her. They called for an ambulance, but she refused medical help. With nothing more they could do, the officers left Eddie and Dorothy at home and returned to their duties.

Officer Haydon spoke with Detective Scott O’Dell at the police department but went to the hospital after receiving a phone call that Dorothy was there. Laura had taken her mother to the hospital and was with her when Officer Haydon arrived. Dorothy spoke openly to him about what had happened, contradicting what she had told officers earlier— that she had caused her own injuries.

Detective O’Dell phoned Eddie the following Monday, November 30. Eddie said in their recorded conversation that Dorothy and he had been together for the four previous days and that she was delusional after having had COVID. Eddie said Dorothy told him she had participated in orgies in the past; had become pregnant by a friend of his; and had two abortions and fifty to sixty “infidelities,” including with some females, during the Ashmores’ previous ten years of marriage. He said she had held him hostage three days at Thanksgiving and physically blocked him from leaving. He said her bruises

and broken bones were from her falling or beating her head on the wall like her mother did, explaining that the two women had “the same mental disorder.”

At trial, Dorothy testified that the following events occurred. The day before Thanksgiving, she and Eddie sat in a smoking area of their garage, and he began asking questions about people she had been intimate with: “He was accusing me of different people that I had been with, and . . . accusing me of being in orgies.” He would set a five- minute timer on his phone; at five minutes he would “bing” a long paperclip against a metal ashtray and say, “Time’s up, time’s up. You didn’t answer fast enough.” Then he would go on to another form of question. This continued all day and all night. Laura was there at one point: she set a timer on her phone for five minutes and asked Dorothy about Dorothy’s mother—who had died the year before. When Laura said she was leaving, Dorothy tried to keep her there because Eddie had stopped questioning her. Dorothy stood in the front doorway and tried to block Laura from going, but Laura eventually left. Eddie and Dorothy went into the living room to watch movies, then back to the garage where the questioning continued, then back to the den. Dorothy did not remember getting any sleep that night. The next morning, she and Eddie were back in the garage. She was smoking cigarettes and having coffee when he started the questioning again, asking about her past abortions and saying that he was not her husband. She testified that it was very confusing and very disorienting, and she became nervous and scared.

Dorothy was up again all through Thanksgiving night, watching movies in the den, being questioned by Eddie in the garage, and watching more movies. Around 2:30 a.m.,

he took her phone and resumed questioning her. He told her, “I’m going to take a hit off the bong, and by the time I’m done with inhaling, and when I exhale, you better have [your] answer ready.” He asked about her “affairs” with fifty people and about orgies. Dorothy testified that “he asks a question, and he hits his bong, and he sits there, and then he breathes out, and he takes that metal paperclip that’s in that metal ashtray, and he clinks it. And he says, ‘Times up.’” He became increasingly aggressive in the questioning: his voice became louder, he gritted his teeth, and he continued questioning. He asked who Laura’s dad was and “who was the person at the orgy.” She told him there was no orgy, but he wanted names. He gave her pen and paper to write their names. He screamed out the name of a former employee from their business in a previous city.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eddie J. Ashmore v. State of Arkansas, 2024 Ark. App. 506 (Ark. Ct. App. 2024).

2024 Ark. App. 506 (Eddie J. Ashmore v. State of Arkansas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jeffery D. Parnell v. State of Arkansas
2025 Ark. App. 417 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2025)
Minor Child v. State of Arkansas
2025 Ark. App. 76 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2025)
John Malone v. State of Arkansas
2025 Ark. App. 84 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2025)