E. F. Blankenship Co. v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
351 S.E.2d 293, 318 N.C. 685, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 1744
Opinion
The Court is evenly divided. Under these circumstances, following the uniform practice of this Court and the ancient rule of praesumitur pro negante, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, not as precedent but as the decision in this case.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E. F. Blankenship Co. v. North Carolina Department of Transportation, 351 S.E.2d 293, 318 N.C. 685, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 1744 (N.C. 1987).
351 S.E.2d 293 (E. F. Blankenship Co. v. North Carolina Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nello L. Teer Co. v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
625 S.E.2d 135 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
A.H. Beck Foundation Co. v. Jones Bros.
603 S.E.2d 819 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)