E. F. Barnes, J. C. Carson, J. Jelks and J. Robertson v. City of Gadsden, Alabama

Fifth Circuit

E. F. Barnes, J. C. Carson, J. Jelks and J. Robertson v. City of Gadsden, Alabama

268 F.2d 593

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 4, 1959

Docket17534

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 268 F.2d 593 (E. F. Barnes, J. C. Carson, J. Jelks and J. Robertson v. City of Gadsden, Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E. F. Barnes, J. C. Carson, J. Jelks and J. Robertson v. City of Gadsden, Alabama, 268 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinions

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a final judgment for defendants. The plaintiffs seek a declaration and injunction against the execution and putting into effect of certain urban redevelopment plans of the City of Gadsden, Alabama, attacked upon the ground that they foster enforced racial segregation. The district court, entered judgment in favor of defendants pursuant to findings of fact and conclusions of law, now reported in 174 F.Supp. 64, with which all of the members of this Court were tentatively in agreement [594]*594in our first conference following the argument and submission of this appeal. After further study and more mature deliberation, Judges Cameron and Jones adhere to that view while the writer concurs in part and dissents in part for reasons separately stated. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a final judgment for defendants. The plaintiffs seek a declaration and injunction against the execution and putting into effect of certain urban redevelopment plans of the City of Gadsden, Alabama, attacked upon the ground that they foster enforced racial segregation. The district court, entered judgment in favor of defendants pursuant to findings of fact and conclusions of law, now reported in 174 F.Supp. 64, with which all of the members of this Court were tentatively in agreement [594]*594in our first conference following the argument and submission of this appeal. After further study and more mature deliberation, Judges Cameron and Jones adhere to that view while the writer concurs in part and dissents in part for reasons separately stated. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 F.2d 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-f-barnes-j-c-carson-j-jelks-and-j-robertson-v-city-of-gadsden-ca5-1959.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack