E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 403
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 Cust. Ct. 771 →
United States Customs Court·Decided April 3, 1962·No. No. 66658; protest 61/12137 (Ogdensburg)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, covered by entry 0-1202, consists of a diaphragm aperture block for a Cobalt therapy unit and the merchandise, covered by entry 0-1884, consists of a treatment head for a Cobalt therapy unit, imported for the use of nonprofit organizations, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 403 (cusc 1962).
48 Cust. Ct. 403 (E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.