E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 353
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 27, 1962
DocketNo. 66501; protests 60/13805 and 60/16913 (Ogdensburg)
StatusPublished

This text of 48 Cust. Ct. 353 (E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 353 (cusc 1962).

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Diversol” similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 65455, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Cust. Ct. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/e-dillingham-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1962.