E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 395
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 Cust. Ct. 771 →
United States Customs Court·Decided April 2, 1962·No. No. 66644; protest 61/12139 (Ogdensburg)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, covered by entries 0-616 and 0-1132, consists of model-B Cobalt therapy units; the merchandise, covered by entry 0-1133, of one model-B Cobalt therapy [396]*396unit with accessories and parts; and the merchandise, covered by entry 0-2451, of a model-A Cobalt therapy unit, all imported for the use of nonprofit organizations, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 395 (cusc 1962).
48 Cust. Ct. 395 (E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.