Durst Industries, Inc. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1026, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1919
United States Customs Court·Decided March 25, 1968·No. No. P68/174; protests 65/11684, 65/12596, and 65/18476 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Becicworti-i, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of hose nozzles in chief value of zinc similar in all material respects, except for composition, to those the subject of United States v. Lipman's (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), and that the items marked “B” consist of shutoff connections, gooseneck connections, snap attachments, or Siamese shutoffs in chief value of zinc similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of said C.A.D. 859, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durst Industries, Inc. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1026, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1919 (cusc 1968).

60 Cust. Ct. 1026 (Durst Industries, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.