Durst Industries, Inc. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1012, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2815
United States Customs Court·Decided March 6, 1968·No. No. P68/120; protests 65/17331 and 65/17332 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of strainers in chief value of brass the same in all material respects as those the subject of Davies, Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651) and that the items marked “B” consist of strainers in chief value of steel similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 69651, supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durst Industries, Inc. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1012, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2815 (cusc 1968).

60 Cust. Ct. 1012 (Durst Industries, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davies, Turner & Co. v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 488 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)