Durst Industries, Inc. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1023, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1927
United States Customs Court·Decided March 19, 1968·No. No. P68/163; protests 65/15439, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hose nozzles and other garden hose accessories in chief value of zinc; that said items consist either of hose nozzles the same in all material respects, except composition, as those the subject of United States v. Lipman's (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), or they consist of connections or attachments, each item being attached to the end of a garden hose in the same manner that the aforementioned nozzles are attached to a garden hose, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durst Industries, Inc. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1023, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1927 (cusc 1968).

60 Cust. Ct. 1023 (Durst Industries, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.