Dunn v. . Taylor

121 S.E. 659, 187 N.C. 385, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 293
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 12, 1924·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Stacy, J.

The December Term of court ended in Kinston when the judge left the bench for the term, although no notice was given of the final adjournment, and it was understood that the term of court should expire by limitation. Delafield v. Const. Co., 115 N. C., 21; Branch v. Walker, 92 N. C., 87. His Honor, therefore, was without authority to enter the order, signed at his home in Clinton, canceling or vacating the judgment previously rendered by him at term. The plaintiff’s exception to this order must be sustained; but this will be done without prejudice to the rights of the defendant to assail the judgment rendered at the December term, or to have it vacated by motion in the cause or other appropriate remedy.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunn v. . Taylor, 121 S.E. 659, 187 N.C. 385, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 293 (N.C. 1924).

121 S.E. 659 (Dunn v. . Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jones
219 S.E.2d 793 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Dellinger v. Clark
67 S.E.2d 448 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
State v. . McLeod
22 S.E.2d 233 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
White Way Laundry, Inc. v. Underwood
16 S.E.2d 703 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
Pendergraph v. . Davis
169 S.E. 815 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Hinnant v. . Insurance Co.
168 S.E. 199 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Hinnant v. American Fire & Marine Insurance
204 N.C. 307 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Pruitt v. . Wood
156 S.E. 126 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Bisanar v. . Suttlemyre
138 S.E. 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Dunn v. . Taylor
124 S.E. 924 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)