Hinnant v. American Fire & Marine Insurance

204 N.C. 307
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 8, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 204 N.C. 307 (Hinnant v. American Fire & Marine Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinnant v. American Fire & Marine Insurance, 204 N.C. 307 (N.C. 1933).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

Laudable as bis purpose may have been, tlie learned judge was without authority to vacate the judgment of nonsuit and grant a new trial after adjournment of the term at which the case was tried, except by consent. Acceptance Corp. v. Jones, 203 N. C., 523; Bisanar v. Suttlemyre, 193 N. C., 711, 138 S. E., 1; Dunn v. Taylor, 187 N. C., 385, 121 S. E., 659.

The order, therefore, from which the defendant appeals, will be stricken out.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manufacturers' Finance Acceptance Corp. v. Jones
166 S.E. 504 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Dunn v. . Taylor
121 S.E. 659 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
Bisanar v. . Suttlemyre
138 S.E. 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 N.C. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinnant-v-american-fire-marine-insurance-nc-1933.