Duncan v. State
Opinion
Appellant is under conviction for transporting intoxicating liquor, his punishment being three years in the penitentiary.
The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review. However, we observe that the sentence fails to give appellant the benefit of the indeterminate feature under the provisions of Article 865a, C. C. P.
*653 The sentence will be reformed to read that appellant shall be confined in the penitentiary not less than one year nor more than three years.
As so reformed the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment reformed and Affirmed. ■
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
273 S.W. 604 (Duncan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.