Duncan v. State
Opinion
— The offense is manslaughter; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of three years.
On the issue of self-defense the testimony of appellant and that of Gordie Davis was in conflict. The privilege of testing her qualification as a witness preliminary to receiving her evidence was denied appellant, and on' her cross-examination she was shown, without objection from the State, to have been an unpardoned convict. This disqualified her as a witness, and appellant’s motion to exclude her testimony should have been sustained. The statute is discussed and decisions cited in Corzine v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 340.
The error requires a reversal of the judgment, and it is so ordered.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
255 S.W. 729 (Duncan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.