Dunahoo v. Dunahoo

182 S.E. 848, 181 Ga. 494, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 139
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 10, 1935
DocketNo. 11111
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 182 S.E. 848 (Dunahoo v. Dunahoo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dunahoo v. Dunahoo, 182 S.E. 848, 181 Ga. 494, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 139 (Ga. 1935).

Opinion

Gilbert, Justice.

The exception is to a refusal to grant an interlocutory injunction to prevent the sale of property under an execution. Held, that the petitioner had an adequate and complete remedy at law by claim. Teasley v. Bradley, 110 Ga. 497 (35 S. E. 782, 78 Am. St. R. 113); Douglas v. Jenkins, 146 Ga. 341 (91 S. E. 49, Ann. Cas. 1918C, 322); Williams v. Smith, 148 Ga. 615 (97 S. E. 670); Myers v. Warrenfells, 153 Ga. 648, 653 (113 S. E. 180); Eslinger v. Herndon, 158 Ga. 823 (124 S. E. 169, 900); James v. Upton, 160 Ga. 819 (129 S. E. 100); Perry v. Gormley, 177 Ga. 372 (170 S. E. 223). The court did not err in refusing an injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices conrywr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scarbrough v. Cook
69 S.E.2d 201 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Ware v. Martin
63 S.E.2d 335 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 S.E. 848, 181 Ga. 494, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dunahoo-v-dunahoo-ga-1935.