James v. Upton

129 S.E. 100, 160 Ga. 819, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 269

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 14, 1925·No. No. 4767·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition.

(а) Plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law, by claim. Douglas v. Jenkins, 146 Ga. 341, 343 (91 S. E. 49).

(б) The interest in the land claimed by plaintiff was not set out with sufficient definiteness. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. L. 8. James', Orville D. Rogers, and W. A. James, for plaintiffs. A. J. Gamp, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition.

(а) Plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law, by claim. Douglas v. Jenkins, 146 Ga. 341, 343 (91 S. E. 49).

(б) The interest in the land claimed by plaintiff was not set out with sufficient definiteness. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. L. 8. James', Orville D. Rogers, and W. A. James, for plaintiffs. A. J. Gamp, for defendants.

James v. Upton, 129 S.E. 100, 160 Ga. 819, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 269 (Ga. 1925).

Pincite

129 S.E. 100 (James v. Upton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.