James v. Upton
129 S.E. 100, 160 Ga. 819, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 269
This text of 129 S.E. 100 (James v. Upton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
James v. Upton, 129 S.E. 100, 160 Ga. 819, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 269 (Ga. 1925).
Opinion
The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition.
(а) Plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law, by claim. Douglas v. Jenkins, 146 Ga. 341, 343 (91 S. E. 49).
(б) The interest in the land claimed by plaintiff was not set out with sufficient definiteness. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Scarbrough v. Cook
69 S.E.2d 201 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Dunahoo v. Dunahoo
182 S.E. 848 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 100, 160 Ga. 819, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-upton-ga-1925.