Perry v. Gormley

170 S.E. 223, 177 Ga. 372, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 182
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 13, 1933
DocketNo. 9561
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 170 S.E. 223 (Perry v. Gormley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. Gormley, 170 S.E. 223, 177 Ga. 372, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 182 (Ga. 1933).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. “When any sheriff or other officer shall levy an execution or other process on property claimed by a third person not a party to such execution, such person, his agent, or attorney shall make oath to such property.” Civil Code (1910), § 5157. ■

2. The petitioners had an adequate and complete remedy at law by claim. Teasley v. Bradley, 110 Ga. 497 (35 S. E. 782, 78 Am. St. R. 113) ; Douglas v. Jenkins, 146 Ga. 341 (91 S. E. 49, Ann. Cas. 1918C, 322); Myers v. Warrenfells, 153 Ga. 648, 653 (113 S. E. 180); Eslinger v. Herndon, 158 Ga. 823 (124 S. E. 169, 900).

3. Eor the reasons stated above, the court did not err in refusing to grant an injunction. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. George W. Westmoreland, for plaintiffs. D. M. Parker, assistant attorney-general, Pemberton Cooley, Joe Cooley, and Alexander Stephens, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunahoo v. Dunahoo
182 S.E. 848 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Citizens Finance Co. v. Griffin
172 S.E. 339 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 S.E. 223, 177 Ga. 372, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-gormley-ga-1933.