Dumas v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
139 F. Supp. 2d 1243, 2001 WL 363359
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama
DecidedApril 5, 2001
DocketCIV. A. 93-C-2688-S
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 139 F. Supp. 2d 1243 (Dumas v. Tyson Foods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dumas v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 2d 1243, 2001 WL 363359 (N.D. Ala. 2001).
Opinion
Janice M. DUMAS, Plaintiff,
v.
TYSON FOODS, INC., Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division.
*1244 Alicia K Haynes, Kenneth D Haynes, Haynes & Haynes PC, Birmingham, AL, Larry R Mann, New South Federal Savings Bldg, Birmingham, AL, Joe R Whatley, Jr, Whatley Drake LLC, Birmingham, AL, Elizabeth R Jones, Birmingham, AL, for Janice M Dumas, plaintiff.
Michael R Jones, Paul A Gilker, Gilker & Jones, Mountainburg, AR, Peyton Lacy, Jr, Timothy A Palmer, David L Warren, Jr, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC, Birmingham, AL, Thomas F Campbell, Campbell & Baker LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Tyson Foods, Inc., defendant.
Hycall Brooks, III, Charles I. Brooks, Brooks Firm PC, Birmingham, AL, for Cordell Miller, movant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES
CLEMON, Chief Judge.
This case started in December of 1993. It was tried for five days in October-November of 1995. Plaintiff prevailed at *1245 trial. Defendant's appeal and Plaintiff's cross-appeal to the Eleventh Circuit were unsuccessful.
The case has been hotly contested, from beginning to end. Several motions for sanctions have been filed. At one point, Defendant sought to depose Plaintiff's attorneys. Defendant unsuccessfully sought a writ of mandamus against the judge. Counsel for both parties have at times unreasonably pursued or resisted discovery.
The Court held a hearing on Plaintiff's application for attorneys' fees in April of 1998, and partial attorneys' fees were awarded at that time. In this Opinion, the Court disposes of the remaining aspects of the attorneys' fees application.
I. Plaintiff's Efforts and Success
Brought and maintained by the then-discharged Plaintiff individually, had this case been certified as a class action, it could not have been more beneficial to Defendant's female workforce. At trial, Plaintiff exposed outrageous conduct directed at female workers by male workers and supervisors in the workplace at Defendant's chicken plant in Blountsville, Alabama. The jury was so moved by the reprehensibility of the workplace atmosphere that it returned a punitive damage award of $8,000,000 against Defendant. Plaintiff individually obtained all the relief that she could legally and equitably obtain under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. ("Title VII")reinstatement, $323,000 in compensatory and punitive damages. On November 3, 1995, Defendant, its "managers, supervisors, employees, and those in active concert and participation with them [were] PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from maintaining the existence of a sexually hostile work environment for the female employees...." (Fin. Judgmt. & Perm. Inj. at 1.)
But before the ink was dry on the first Injunction, Defendant began retaliating against some of Plaintiff's trial witnesses. Plaintiff's counsel was obliged to file a Motion for an Order to Show Cause. On November 8, 1995, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on Plaintiff's Show Cause Motion.
Based on the evidence adduced at the Show Cause hearing, the Court issued, on the same day, an Anti-Retaliation Injunction against Defendant, permanently enjoining it from retaliating against Plaintiff and other employees because of their "direct or indirect support of plaintiff's position in this case or their opposition to perceived unlawful employment practices based on sex at [Defendant]'s Blountsville Plant." (Anti-Retaliation Inj. at 1.) Defendant was ordered to post the following Notice at each of the time clocks, bulletin boards, management offices, break rooms, and eating facilities of the Blountsville facility. Because the Notice is fairly descriptive of what this lawsuit was about and what it achieved, the Notice is reproduced here:
In 1993, a former worker of the Company, Ms. Janice Dumas, filed a lawsuit claiming that the workplace here at Tyson is unfair, insulting, embarrassing, disrespectful, and humiliating for the female workers. This is what is known in law as a claim of a "sexually hostile work environment." A sexually hostile work environment is unlawful. The case was tried by a federal court jury in Birmingham in November 1995.
Mrs. Dumas won the case.
Federal Judge U.W. Clemon has now issued a court order telling the Company to stop and discontinue any actions that discriminate against women on the basis of sex. This means that in the future, the men workers and supervisors must treat the women workers just as they would want their mothers and sisters to be treated on a job. If Tyson *1246 does not follow the court order, it will be held in contempt of court and it may be exposed to a heavy fine or its managers may be sent to jail.
From now on, ANY MALE SUPERVISOR OR EMPLOYEE WHO SUBJECTS A FEMALE WORKER TO SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE (including production lines, break rooms, cafeteria, restrooms) WHETHER BY WORDS (such as "bitch," "whore," "sweetheart," or "darling") OR CONDUCT (such as touching a woman's body, embracing her, kissing her, exposing his private parts, simulating a sex act by use of chicken parts or otherwise) WILL BE PROMPTLY REPRIMANDED, SUSPENDED, AND/OR FIRED. Any such supervisor or employee may also be held in contempt.
Also, THE COMPANY WILL PROMPTLY REPRIMAND, SUSPEND, OR FIRE ANY EMPLOYEE, MALE OR FEMALE, WHO THREATENS, ABUSES, OR INTIMIDATES AN EMPLOYEE WHO EITHER TESTIFIED FOR MRS. DUMAS OR SUPPORTED HER CASE. It is unlawful and a violation of the court order to retaliate against anyone because he or she helped another person on a sex discrimination claim.
* * * * * *
THE COMPANY ENCOURAGES ANY FEMALE WORKER WHO FEELS THAT SHE HAS BEEN HARASSED, RETALIATED OR OTHERWISE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST BECAUSE OF HER SEX, OR ANYONE WHO IS A WITNESS TO SEXUAL HARASSMENT OR DISCRIMINATION TO MAKE A COMPLAINT DIRECTLY TO THE PLANT MANAGER OR SHIFT MANAGER. NO ONE WILL BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE HE OR SHE HAS MADE SUCH A COMPLAINT.
Id.
Thus, this litigation achieved all the relief that the law provides in terms of transforming Defendant's pervasive sexually hostile work environment into one which accords respect to the basic humanity of its female workers.
II. Reasonable Hourly Rates
Alicia Haynes has practiced law in the Northern District of Alabama since 1987, specializing in employment cases. If Haynes had been retained to represent a Title VII defendant in 1998, she would have billed at an hourly rate of $175-190. Because she worked on a contingency basis and achieved significant results, the Court finds that a reasonable hourly rate for her is $215, in light of similar awards made by this judge in similar cases.
Larry Mann has practiced in the Northern District of Alabama since 1992. Before entering private practice, he had worked for a decade in a paralegal capacity with two law firms specializing in plaintiffs' cases. As co-counsel with Haynes, he successfully represented a plaintiff in another employment case in this Court, which resulted in a jury verdict of $887,000. If Mann had been retained to represent a Title VII defendant in 1998, he would have billed at $150160 hourly. The contingency of his fee arrangement, similar awards by this judge, and success factors of Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Janice M. DUMAS, Plaintiff,
v.
TYSON FOODS, INC., Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division.
*1244 Alicia K Haynes, Kenneth D Haynes, Haynes & Haynes PC, Birmingham, AL, Larry R Mann, New South Federal Savings Bldg, Birmingham, AL, Joe R Whatley, Jr, Whatley Drake LLC, Birmingham, AL, Elizabeth R Jones, Birmingham, AL, for Janice M Dumas, plaintiff.
Michael R Jones, Paul A Gilker, Gilker & Jones, Mountainburg, AR, Peyton Lacy, Jr, Timothy A Palmer, David L Warren, Jr, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC, Birmingham, AL, Thomas F Campbell, Campbell & Baker LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Tyson Foods, Inc., defendant.
Hycall Brooks, III, Charles I. Brooks, Brooks Firm PC, Birmingham, AL, for Cordell Miller, movant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES
CLEMON, Chief Judge.
This case started in December of 1993. It was tried for five days in October-November of 1995. Plaintiff prevailed at *1245 trial. Defendant's appeal and Plaintiff's cross-appeal to the Eleventh Circuit were unsuccessful.
The case has been hotly contested, from beginning to end. Several motions for sanctions have been filed. At one point, Defendant sought to depose Plaintiff's attorneys. Defendant unsuccessfully sought a writ of mandamus against the judge. Counsel for both parties have at times unreasonably pursued or resisted discovery.
The Court held a hearing on Plaintiff's application for attorneys' fees in April of 1998, and partial attorneys' fees were awarded at that time. In this Opinion, the Court disposes of the remaining aspects of the attorneys' fees application.
I. Plaintiff's Efforts and Success
Brought and maintained by the then-discharged Plaintiff individually, had this case been certified as a class action, it could not have been more beneficial to Defendant's female workforce. At trial, Plaintiff exposed outrageous conduct directed at female workers by male workers and supervisors in the workplace at Defendant's chicken plant in Blountsville, Alabama. The jury was so moved by the reprehensibility of the workplace atmosphere that it returned a punitive damage award of $8,000,000 against Defendant. Plaintiff individually obtained all the relief that she could legally and equitably obtain under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. ("Title VII")reinstatement, $323,000 in compensatory and punitive damages. On November 3, 1995, Defendant, its "managers, supervisors, employees, and those in active concert and participation with them [were] PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from maintaining the existence of a sexually hostile work environment for the female employees...." (Fin. Judgmt. & Perm. Inj. at 1.)
But before the ink was dry on the first Injunction, Defendant began retaliating against some of Plaintiff's trial witnesses. Plaintiff's counsel was obliged to file a Motion for an Order to Show Cause. On November 8, 1995, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on Plaintiff's Show Cause Motion.
Based on the evidence adduced at the Show Cause hearing, the Court issued, on the same day, an Anti-Retaliation Injunction against Defendant, permanently enjoining it from retaliating against Plaintiff and other employees because of their "direct or indirect support of plaintiff's position in this case or their opposition to perceived unlawful employment practices based on sex at [Defendant]'s Blountsville Plant." (Anti-Retaliation Inj. at 1.) Defendant was ordered to post the following Notice at each of the time clocks, bulletin boards, management offices, break rooms, and eating facilities of the Blountsville facility. Because the Notice is fairly descriptive of what this lawsuit was about and what it achieved, the Notice is reproduced here:
In 1993, a former worker of the Company, Ms. Janice Dumas, filed a lawsuit claiming that the workplace here at Tyson is unfair, insulting, embarrassing, disrespectful, and humiliating for the female workers. This is what is known in law as a claim of a "sexually hostile work environment." A sexually hostile work environment is unlawful. The case was tried by a federal court jury in Birmingham in November 1995.
Mrs. Dumas won the case.
Federal Judge U.W. Clemon has now issued a court order telling the Company to stop and discontinue any actions that discriminate against women on the basis of sex. This means that in the future, the men workers and supervisors must treat the women workers just as they would want their mothers and sisters to be treated on a job. If Tyson *1246 does not follow the court order, it will be held in contempt of court and it may be exposed to a heavy fine or its managers may be sent to jail.
From now on, ANY MALE SUPERVISOR OR EMPLOYEE WHO SUBJECTS A FEMALE WORKER TO SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE (including production lines, break rooms, cafeteria, restrooms) WHETHER BY WORDS (such as "bitch," "whore," "sweetheart," or "darling") OR CONDUCT (such as touching a woman's body, embracing her, kissing her, exposing his private parts, simulating a sex act by use of chicken parts or otherwise) WILL BE PROMPTLY REPRIMANDED, SUSPENDED, AND/OR FIRED. Any such supervisor or employee may also be held in contempt.
Also, THE COMPANY WILL PROMPTLY REPRIMAND, SUSPEND, OR FIRE ANY EMPLOYEE, MALE OR FEMALE, WHO THREATENS, ABUSES, OR INTIMIDATES AN EMPLOYEE WHO EITHER TESTIFIED FOR MRS. DUMAS OR SUPPORTED HER CASE. It is unlawful and a violation of the court order to retaliate against anyone because he or she helped another person on a sex discrimination claim.
* * * * * *
THE COMPANY ENCOURAGES ANY FEMALE WORKER WHO FEELS THAT SHE HAS BEEN HARASSED, RETALIATED OR OTHERWISE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST BECAUSE OF HER SEX, OR ANYONE WHO IS A WITNESS TO SEXUAL HARASSMENT OR DISCRIMINATION TO MAKE A COMPLAINT DIRECTLY TO THE PLANT MANAGER OR SHIFT MANAGER. NO ONE WILL BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE HE OR SHE HAS MADE SUCH A COMPLAINT.
Id.
Thus, this litigation achieved all the relief that the law provides in terms of transforming Defendant's pervasive sexually hostile work environment into one which accords respect to the basic humanity of its female workers.
II. Reasonable Hourly Rates
Alicia Haynes has practiced law in the Northern District of Alabama since 1987, specializing in employment cases. If Haynes had been retained to represent a Title VII defendant in 1998, she would have billed at an hourly rate of $175-190. Because she worked on a contingency basis and achieved significant results, the Court finds that a reasonable hourly rate for her is $215, in light of similar awards made by this judge in similar cases.
Larry Mann has practiced in the Northern District of Alabama since 1992. Before entering private practice, he had worked for a decade in a paralegal capacity with two law firms specializing in plaintiffs' cases. As co-counsel with Haynes, he successfully represented a plaintiff in another employment case in this Court, which resulted in a jury verdict of $887,000. If Mann had been retained to represent a Title VII defendant in 1998, he would have billed at $150160 hourly. The contingency of his fee arrangement, similar awards by this judge, and success factors of Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir.1974), justify an upward adjustment of his hourly rate to $190.
Attorneys' travel time should be compensated at an hourly rate of $100.
Elizabeth R. Jones has practiced law for nearly two decades. She specializes in appellate work. Rejecting out of hand Defendant's contention that she should be *1247 compensated at the rate of $100 hourly, (Def. Obj. to Pla.'s App, for Attys Fees, at 25), the Court finds that a reasonable hourly rate for her services is $225.
Wendy Nix Thornton was a third-year law student in Alicia Haynes' firm when she provided services in this case as a Title VII litigation assistant, effectively a paralegal. A reasonable hourly rate for her services is $30.
Beth Gann is a paralegal in Alicia Haynes' office, having received her baccalaureate degree in paralegal studies from Samford University. Before her employment by Haynes & Haynes, she worked at two of the major law firms in the Northern District of Alabama. The Court finds that a reasonable hourly rate for her services is $60.
III. Hours Reasonably Expended
Presumably after exercising their billing judgment, counsel for Defendant billed their client for 3,662.87 hours for representation in this case. Plaintiff's attorneys have sworn to the Court that they have reasonably expended 4,121 hours in the successful prosecution of this case. On its face, the number of hours claimed by Plaintiff's counsel is not unreasonable. After all, as a general proposition, it takes more effort to win than it takes to lose. Nonetheless, the Court has carefully considered each of Defendant's myriad objections. Upon such deliberate consideration, the Court's conscience is soothed, rather than shocked. Cf. Fair Housing Council of Greater Washington v. Landow, 999 F.2d 92 (4th Cir.1993); Lewis v. Kendrick, 944 F.2d 949 (1st Cir.1991); Brown v. Stackler, 612 F.2d 1057 (7th Cir.1980).
As reflected in Attachment "A," the Court has in part sustained the Defendant's objections and reduced the claimed hours, which in the Court's "Monday morning quarterbacking," appear to be redundant, excessive, or inadequately documented or explained. It has disallowed the hours that were exclusively expended in pressing Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Brumblow in his individual capacity and the state law claims. It has disallowed the time expended on Plaintiff's unemployment compensation claim. It has disallowed the hours claimed for Title VII seminars. It has disallowed the hours attributable to the failure of Plaintiff's counsel to initially comply with the page limitations of the Eleventh Circuit. Moreover, it has reduced the time allocable to Plaintiff's unsuccessful cross-appeal. As a result, the Court has reduced the total hours claimed to a number below that expended by Defendant's counselso that in this case, the Court finds that it took fewer hours to win than it took to lose.
Defendant makes too much of Plaintiff's state law claims. All of the evidence heard by the jury on the state law claims was entirely relevant to the Title VII claim of a hostile work environment. If Defendant's supervisor Jimmy Brumblow had not been sued by Plaintiff for violations of the laws of Alabama in this case, Plaintiff would have offered to the jury his same uncivilized conduct which contributed substantially to an unbelievably hostile work environment for female employees at Tyson. It was a "same evidence anyway" presentation, with or without the state law claims and the individual claims against Jimmy Blumblow. The same operative facts were involved. See Davis v. Locke, 936 F.2d 1208, 1214 (11th Cir.1991).
Defendant also overlooks that while several of Plaintiff's witnesses had separate claims, the evidence that they presented at the trial of this case bore directly on the existence vel non of a sexually hostile work environment. It is completely irrelevant that subsequently they may have used some of this evidence in their individual cases against Defendant.
*1248 Alicia Haynes has claimed 2057.6 hours in this case. Based on Defendant's objections, the Court has disallowed 85.50 of her claimed hours, and it has disallowed 35 hours (travel time) at the lodestar rate. See Attachment "A" at 1250, infra. It has disallowed a fourth (61 hours) of her appellate hours based on the unsuccessful cross-appeal. The Court will credit an additional four hours for her preparation and participation at the hearing on attorneys' fees. The Court finds that she has reasonably expended 1880.10 regular hours in the prosecution of this case, and that she has expended 35 hours of travel time.
Larry Mann claims a total of 1651.5 hours in this case. Based on Defendant's objections, the Court has disallowed 447.45 of those hours. Id. It has disallowed another 35 of those hours (travel hours) at the lodestar rate. It has disallowed 3.75 of his appellate hours as duplicative or unsatisfactorily explained, and it reduced his appellate hours by a fourth (40 hours) because of the cross-appeal. The Court will credit an additional four hours for his preparation for and participation in the hearing on attorneys' fees. The Court finds that he has reasonably expended 1129.30 regular hours in the prosecution of this case and that he has expended 35 hours in travel time.
Wendy Nix claims 265.95 hours in this case. The Court has disallowed 9.50 of those hours, based on Defendant's well-founded objections. Id. She is entitled to 256.45 hours.
Elizabeth Jones claims 147 hours for her trial and appellate work in this case. Based on Defendant's objections, the Court has disallowed 5 hours (state law claims) of her claimed time in the district court; 11.75 of her appellate hours (re-editing the appellate brief to conform to the Appellate Rules); and another 27.5 hours (for time allocable to the cross-appeal). She is allowed 102.7 hours for her work in this case.
Alicia Haynes claims 694.5 hours for her paralegal, Beth Gann. The Court finds merit in Defendant's objections to 16.90 of those hours. The Court finds that Gann reasonably expended 677.60 hours of paralegal service.
At the conclusion of the attorneys' fee hearing in April of 1998, based on the number of hours stipulated by Defendants, Alicia Haynes was paid $175,000 and Larry Mann $125,000 by Defendant, pursuant to the order of the Court.
In summary, the Court finds 3314.80 hours to have been reasonably expended in the prosecution of this case, allocated as follows:
Alicia Haynes .....1880.10 regular hours plus 35
hours travel time
Larry Mann.........1129.30 regular hours plus 35
hours travel time
Elizabeth Jones....102.7 regular hours
The Court finds that Beth Gann reasonably expended 6777.60 hours and that Wendy Nix Thornton reasonably expended 256.45 hours in assisting the Plaintiff's lawyers.
IV. Interest/Enhancement For Delay
Plaintiff's counsel are entitled to a reasonable rate of interest on the attorneys' fees that are owed to them. Defendant has had actual use of the principal sum since April of 1997 and/or the opportunity of earning a reasonable rate of interest on it. The Court finds that a 7% compound interest rate should be utilized resulting in a 22% enhancement.
V. Costs
Plaintiff seeks $34,206.37 in her Bill of Costs. The Court has disallowed many of the items. See Attachment "B" at 41 infra.
The Court allows witness fees for all summoned witnesses, regardless of *1249 whether they actually testified at trial. It approves the claim for enlargements ("blow-ups") of exhibits used at trial. It allows for the copying costs of papers necessarily obtained for use in the case, but it disallows the copying costs of general filed pleadings, such as Plaintiff's Proposed Rule 26 Disclosures. It approves the deposition expenses for deponents who testified at trial; it disallows them for deponents who did not testify at trial. It approves Mark McKnight's fee for obtaining the order quashing deposition notices served on Plaintiff's counsel. It approves Plaintiff's counsel's mediation expenses. It allows the costs for service of subpoenas on witnesses who would not produce or accept service. The Court disallows the expert witness fee, the filing fee for cross-appeal, and the Westlaw research fee.
The Court concludes that costs in the amount of $23,508.35 should be taxed against Defendant.
Conclusion
By separate order, the findings incorporated in this Memorandum Opinion will be embodied in a Final Judgment Awarding Attorneys' Fees and Costs.
*1250
Attachment "A"
DISPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS
TO HOURS CLAIMED
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/20/93 | Haynes | 2.75 | S | 1.75 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/17/93 | Mann | 3.25 | S | 1.25 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/18/93 | Haynes | 3.00 | S | 2.00 | Unrelated - state law claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/01/93 | Haynes | 5.75 | | 1.90 | Unrelated - state law claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/02/93 | Haynes | 4.00 | | 1.30 | Excessive - Bromblow claim |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/15/93 | Haynes | 4.75 | S | 2.75 | Excessive - Bromblow claim |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/15/93 | Mann | 4.75 | S | 2.00 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/07/94 | Haynes | 3.00 | S | 1.50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/07/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/18/94 | Haynes | 2.25 | S | 1.25 | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/21/94 | Haynes | 1.75 | S | 1.25 | Excessive- Bromblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/01/94 | Mann | 1.00 | S | .3 | Excessive-Bromblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/01/94 | Mann | 1.50 | S | 0 | Excessive-Bromblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/01/94 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/05/94 | Mann | 1.50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/10/94 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/14/94 | Haynes | 1.00 | | .30 | Excessive-Bromblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/14/94 | Haynes | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/18/94 | Haynes | 1.00 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/03/94 | Mann | 1.00 | S | .50 | Excessive-Bromblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/08/94 | Mann | .50 | 0 | .50 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1251
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/08/94 | Haynes | 5.75 | 0 | 5.75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/13/94 | Mann | 3.25 | S | 2.0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/14/94 | Mann | 3.50 | O | 3.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/18/94 | Mann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/18/94 | Mann | 2.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/21/94 | Mann | 5.75 | S | 3.0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/21/94 | Haynes | 5.75 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/22/94 | Gann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/27/94 | Mann | 1.25 | S | .75 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/28/94 | Mann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/28/94 | Haynes | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/29/94 | Mann | 3.25 | S | 1.0 | Excessive/Inadequate |
| | | | | | Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/30/94 | Mann | 2.00 | S | 0 | Excessive/Inadequate |
| | | | | | Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/30/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/31/94 | Gann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/01/94 | Mann | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/04/94 | Mann | 5.00 | S | 2.0 | Excessive/Duplicative/ |
| | | | | | Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/05/94 | Haynes | .50 | | 0 | Excessive-Brumblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/05/94 | Mann | 5.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/06/94 | Mann | 2.50 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/06/94 | Haynes | 3.00 | | 1.0 | Excessive-Brumblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/08/94 | Haynes | .25 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*1252
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/08/94 | Mann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/11/94 | Mann | 2.75 | S | 2.0 | Unrelated/Duplicative/ |
| | | | | | Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/11/94 | Haynes | 2.75 | S | 2.0 | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/12/94 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Excessive/Duplicative/ |
| | | | | | Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/13/94 | Mann | .75 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/18/94 | Gann | 1.30 | O | 1.30 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/19/94 | Gann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/09/94 | Mann | .75 | S | .25 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/17/94 | Mann | .50 | S | .25 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/30/94 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/30/94 | Mann | 4.00 | S | 2.0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/06/94 | Gann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/10/94 | Mann | 2.00 | S | 1.0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/13/94 | Haynes | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/13/94 | Gann | 3.00 | S | 1.0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/13/94 | Mann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/14/94 | Mann | .25 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/14/94 | Haynes | .50 | S | .25 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/15/94 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1253
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/20/94 | Mann | 2.50 | S | 1.0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/22/94 | Gann | 1.60 | O | 1.60 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/23/94 | Gann | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/27/94 | Haynes | 2.75 | S | 1.40 | Excessive-Brumblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/27/94 | Mann | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/01/94 | Mann | 1.00 | S | 10 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/06/94 | Gann | 3.00 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/07/94 | Gann | 6.50 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/07/94 | Mann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/08/94 | Mann | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/11/94 | Haynes | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/11/94 | Mann | .75 | S | .25 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/12/94 | Mann | 4.50 | O | 4.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 7/12/94 | Haynes | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/13/94 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/13/94 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/13/94 | Mann | 5.00 | S | 2.0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/14/94 | Haynes | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/19/94 | Mann | 3.00 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/19/94 | Haynes | 3.00 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/20/94 | Haynes | 6.00 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/20/94 | Mann | 8.50 | S | 0 | Unrelated/Excessive |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1254
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/21/94 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/22/94 | Mann | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/25/94 | Mann | 3.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/25/94 | Haynes | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/25/94 | Gann | 1.00 | S | .10 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/26/94 | Gann | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/27/94 | Gann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/02/94 | Mann | 2.25 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/08/94 | Mann | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/09/94 | Mann | .25 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/10/94 | Mann | .75 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/15/94 | Haynes | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/15/94 | Mann | .75 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/18/94 | Mann | .75 | S | .25 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/19/94 | Mann | 1.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/22/94 | Mann | 3.00 | S | .50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/24/94 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/24/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/24/94 | Gann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/24/94 | Gann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/24/94 | Gann | 2.00 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/24/94 | Mann | 9.50 | O | 9.50 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1255
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/25/94 | Mann | 9.50 | O | 9.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/25/94 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/25/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/25/94 | Gann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/25/94 | Gann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/26/94 | Mann | 9.50 | O | 9.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/26/94 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/26/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/26/94 | Gann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/26/94 | Gann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/29/94 | Haynes | 2.25 | S | 2.00 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/30/94 | Mann | 4.50 | O | 4.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/01/94 | Mann | 1.50 | S | .50 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/07/94 | Mann | 9.50 | O | 9.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/07/94 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/07/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/07/94 | Gann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/07/94 | Gann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/07/94 | Mann | 9.50 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/08/94 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/08/94 | Gann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/08/94 | Gann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/14/94 | Mann | 2.50 | S | O | Unrelated/Clerical |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/14/94 | Haynes | .75 | O | .75 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1256
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/15/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/15/94 | Mann | 1.25 | O | 1.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/15/94 | Mann | 1.00 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/20/94 | Mann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/21/94 | Haynes | 3.50 | O | 3.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/21/94 | Mann | 3.50 | O | 3.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/22/94 | Mann | 1.50 | S | .75 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/22/94 | Haynes | 1.75 | S | 1.00 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/23/94 | Haynes | 1.50 | S | 1.0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/23/94 | Gann | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/23/94 | Mann | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/24/94 | Haynes | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/26/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/26/94 | Mann | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/28/94 | Mann | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/28/94 | Haynes | 4.00 | S | 2.0 | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/28/94 | Gann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/03/94 | Haynes | 6.50 | O | 6.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/03/94 | Mann | 6.50 | O | 6.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/04/94 | Mann | 8.50 | O | 8.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/04/94 | Haynes | 8.50 | O | 8.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/04/94 | Gann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/05/94 | Mann | 4.00 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/06/94 | Mann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/07/94 | Gann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1257
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/07/94 | Mann | 5.00 | S | 2.0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/08/94 | Mann | 2.50 | S | 2.0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/10/94 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/10/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/10/94 | Mann | 9.50 | O | 9.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/12/94 | Mann | .50 | S | .10 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/14/94 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/14/94 | Haynes | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/17/94 | Mann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/18/94 | Mann | 7.75 | O | 7.75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/19/94 | Gann | 5.50 | O | 5.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/25/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/25/94 | Mann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/94 | Mann | 15.00 | O | 15.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/94 | Mann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/94 | Gann | 14.50 | O | 14.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/94 | Gann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/94 | Mann | 4.50 | O | 4.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/28/94 | Mann | 2.00 | S | 1.00 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/31/94 | Mann | 5.00 | S | 1.00 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/31/94 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/31/94 | Gann | 4.50 | O | 4.50 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1258
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/02/94 | Mann | 2.50 | S | 1.00 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/03/94 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/04/94 | Mann | .75 | S | .20 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/07/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/07/94 | Gann | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/07/94 | Gann | 7.00 | O | 7.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/08/94 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/11/94 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/14/94 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/14/94 | Mann | 7.50 | O | 7.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/15/94 | Mann | 1.00 | S | .20 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/15/94 | Haynes | .75 | S | 0 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/18/94 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/18/94 | Mann | .75 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/23/94 | Mann | .75 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/28/94 | Mann | .25 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/28/94 | Gann | 4.50 | O | 4.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/30/94 | Gann | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/01/94 | Mann | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/02/94 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/02/94 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/02/94 | Gann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/06/94 | Mann | 2.00 | S | .50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1259
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/07/94 | Mann | 1.25 | O | 1.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/07/94 | Haynes | 1.25 | O | 1.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/08/94 | Mann | 4.00 | S | 0 | Unnecessary |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/09/94 | Mann | 1.00 | S | .20 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/12/94 | Haynes | 3.25 | O | 3.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/12/94 | Mann | 10.00 | O | 10.0 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/13/94 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/13/94 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/13/94 | Gann | 6.40 | O | 6.40 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/14/94 | Mann | 12.50 | O | 12.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/15/94 | Mann | 4.75 | O | 4.75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/16/94 | Mann | 1.50 | S | .50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/17/94 | Mann | 1.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/21/94 | Haynes | .25 | | 0 | Excessive-Brumblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/21/94 | Mann | .50 | S | .25 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/22/94 | Mann | 1.50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/23/94 | Haynes | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/23/94 | Mann | .75 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/31/94 | Haynes | 8.50 | O | 8.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 12/31/94 | Mann | 4.25 | S | .75 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/09/95 | Gann | 3.50 | O | 3.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/09/95 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1260
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/11/95 | Mann | 7.00 | S | 1.50 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/11/95 | Haynes | 3.50 | O | 3.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/12/95 | Gann | 2.80 | O | 2.80 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/12/95 | Haynes | 1.75 | S | .75 | Unnecessary/Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/12/95 | Mann | 8.50 | O | 8.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/13/95 | Mann | 12.00 | S | 2.50 | Excessive |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/16/95 | Mann | .50 | S | .20 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/17/95 | Mann | 11.25 | S | 2.25 | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/17/95 | Haynes | 7.25 | O | 7.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/17/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/18/95 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/18/95 | Haynes | 2.25 | S | 1.25 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/18/95 | Mann | 15.00 | O | 15.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/18/95 | Gann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/19/95 | Mann | 9.00 | O | 9.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/20/95 | Mann | 7.75 | O | 7.75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/23/95 | Mann | 10.50 | O | 10.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/24/95 | Mann | 12.00 | O | 12.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/25/95 | Mann | 1.00 | S | .25 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/26/95 | Mann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/26/95 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/26/95 | Haynes | 4.25 | O | 4.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/27/95 | Haynes | 6.00 | S | 3.00 | Excessive |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1261
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/27/95 | Mann | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/27/95 | Mann | 2.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 01/27/95 | Gann | 1.20 | O | 1.20 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/01/95 | Mann | 2.50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/01/95 | Mann | 2.00 | S | .50 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/01/95 | Haynes | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/03/95 | Haynes | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/03/95 | Haynes | 3.00 | | 1.0 | Excessive-Brumblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/03/95 | Mann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/03/95 | Mann | 1.50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/06/95 | Mann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/06/95 | Mann | .75 | S | .25 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/06/95 | Gann | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/08/95 | Mann | 2.00 | S | .50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/09/95 | Mann | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/09/95 | Nix | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/10/95 | Nix | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/10/95 | Mann | .25 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/10/95 | Gann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/10/95 | Gann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/11/95 | Gann | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/13/95 | Gann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/13/95 | Mann | 4.25 | O | 4.25 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1262
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/13/95 | Haynes | 5.25 | O | 5.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/13/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/15/95 | Haynes | 4.25 | O | 4.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/15/95 | Mann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/15/95 | Mann | 4.25 | O | 4.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/15/95 | Mann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/16/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/16/95 | Mann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/16/95 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/16/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/17/95 | Haynes | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/17/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/18/95 | Mann | 1.50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/18/95 | Haynes | 3.50 | S | 1.20 | Excessive-Brumblow claims |
| | | | | | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/19/95 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/19/95 | Mann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/19/95 | Mann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/20/95 | Mann | 2.00 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/20/95 | Mann | 4.00 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/20/95 | Mann | 2.00 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/20/95 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/20/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1263
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/20/95 | Nix | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/21/95 | Mann | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/21/95 | Mann | 2.00 | S | .50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/21/95 | Mann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/21/95 | Mann | 3.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/22/95 | Mann | 2.00 | S | 1.00 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/24/95 | Mann | 4.00 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/27/95 | Gann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 02/28/95 | Gann | 3.50 | O | 3.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/02/95 | Gann | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/03/95 | Mann | 3.00 | S | 1.00 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/03/95 | Mann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/03/95 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/04/95 | Haynes | 3.50 | O | 3.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/04/95 | Mann | 3.50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/04/95 | Mann | 3.50 | S | .75 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/06/95 | Gann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/07/95 | Gann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/08/95 | Mann | 5.50 | O | 5.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/11/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/12/95 | Mann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/13/95 | Mann | .25 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/14/95 | Gann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1264
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/14/95 | Mann | 5.75 | S | 1.50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/14/95 | Mann | 1.00 | S | .50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/15/95 | Mann | 9.50 | O | 9.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/16/95 | Nix | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/17/95 | Haynes | 4.25 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/17/95 | Mann | 4.25 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/17/95 | Mann | 4.25 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/18/95 | Mann | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/18/95 | Haynes | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/19/95 | Mann | 4.50 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/20/95 | Gann | .70 | O | .70 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/21/95 | Gann | .60 | O | .60 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/21/95 | Mann | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/22/95 | Mann | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/22/95 | Haynes | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/22/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/22/95 | Gann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/23/95 | Haynes | 7.50 | O | 7.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/23/95 | Mann | 7.50 | O | 7.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/24/95 | Nix | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/24/95 | Mann | 1.00 | S | .50 | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/24/95 | Haynes | 3.75 | O | 3.75 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1265
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/27/95 | Haynes | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/27/95 | Mann | 4.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/27/95 | Gann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/28/95 | Gann | 7.00 | O | 7.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/28/95 | Mann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/29/95 | Haynes | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/29/95 | Gann | 7.50 | O | 7.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/30/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/31/95 | Haynes | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/31/95 | Mann | .75 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/31/95 | Mann | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 03/31/95 | Gann | .80 | O | .80 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/03/95 | Gann | 6.80 | O | 6.80 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/03/95 | Mann | 4.00 | S | 1.50 | Unrelated |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/03/95 | Haynes | 6.50 | O | 6.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/03/95 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/04/95 | Haynes | 8.25 | O | 8.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/04/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/04/95 | Gann | 6.50 | O | 6.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/05/95 | Gann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/05/95 | Mann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/05/95 | Mann | .25 | O | .25 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1266
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/06/95 | Mann | .25 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/06/95 | Mann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/07/95 | Haynes | 3.50 | O | 3.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/08/95 | Haynes | 6.75 | O | 6.75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/09/95 | Haynes | 7.00 | O | 7.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/09/95 | Mann | 7.00 | O | 7.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/09/95 | Mann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/10/95 | Mann | 12.00 | O | 12.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/10/95 | Mann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/10/95 | Haynes | 12.00 | O | 12.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/10/95 | Haynes | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/10/95 | Gann | 3.50 | O | 3.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/11/95 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 4.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/11/95 | Mann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/12/95 | Mann | 5.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/12/95 | Haynes | 5.25 | O | 5.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/12/95 | Gann | .30 | O | .30 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/14/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/14/95 | Mann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/17/95 | Mann | 5.00 | S | 1.50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/17/95 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1267
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/18/95 | Mann | 4.25 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/19/95 | Mann | 2.75 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/20/95 | Gann | .60 | O | .60 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/20/95 | Mann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/25/95 | Gann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/26/95 | Gann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/26/95 | Mann | 2.00 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/26/95 | Haynes | 2.25 | O | 2.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 04/28/95 | Mann | 4.00 | S | 2.50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/01/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/02/95 | Gann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/03/95 | Mann | 7.25 | O | 7.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/05/95 | Mann | 4.00 | S | .50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/08/95 | Haynes | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/08/95 | Mann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/08/95 | Mann | 3.00 | S | .50 | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/08/95 | Gann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/09/95 | Haynes | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/10/95 | Haynes | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/10/95 | Haynes | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/10/95 | Mann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/10/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/11/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1268
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/11/95 | Haynes | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/12/95 | Haynes | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/12/95 | Mann | .75 | S | .25 | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/12/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/13/95 | Mann | 4.00 | S | 2.00 | Unrelated |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/13/95 | Haynes | 7.00 | O | 7.00 | |
| 05/14/95 | | | | | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/14/95 | Haynes | 2.75 | O | 2.75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/15/95 | Haynes | 10.00 | O | 10.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/15/95 | Mann | 12.00 | O | 12.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/16/95 | Mann | 16.00 | O | 16.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/17/95 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/17/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/18/95 | Mann | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/18/95 | Mann | 4.50 | O | 4.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/18/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/19/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/19/95 | Haynes | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/19/95 | Mann | 3.00 | S | .50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/20/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/21/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/22/95 | Gann | 4.50 | O | 4.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/22/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/23/95 | Haynes | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1269
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/23/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/23/95 | Gann | 4.30 | O | 4.30 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/24/95 | Gann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/24/95 | Mann | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/24/95 | Haynes | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/15/95 | Gann | .30 | O | .30 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/25/95 | Gann | .30 | O | .30 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/30/95 | Mann | 2.50 | S | 1.50 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/30/95 | Haynes | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/30/95 | Gann | .80 | O | .80 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/31/95 | Haynes | 2.25 | O | 2.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 05/31/95 | Mann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/01/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/02/95 | Haynes | 3.75 | O | 3.75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/02/95 | Haynes | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/02/95 | Haynes | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/02/95 | Mann | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/02/95 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/02/95 | Mann | 5.00 | S | .50 | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/02/95 | Gann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/02/95 | Nix | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/05/95 | Mann | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/05.95 | Gann | .50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/06/95 | Mann | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1270
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/07/95 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/07/95 | Gann | .40 | O | .40 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/08/95 | Mann | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/09/95 | Mann | 3.00 | S | .50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| | | | | | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/09/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/12/95 | Haynes | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/12/95 | Mann | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/14/95 | Haynes | 1.25 | O | 1.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/14/95 | Mann | 1.25 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/15/95 | Mann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/15/95 | Haynes | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/15/95 | Haynes | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/16/95 | Nix | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/22/95 | Haynes | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/22/95 | Mann | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/23/95 | Mann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/23/95 | Mann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/23/95 | Haynes | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/25/95 | Mann | 3.00 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/25/95 | Nix | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/26/95 | Mann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/26/95 | Haynes | 6.50 | O | 6.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/26/95 | Nix | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1271
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/27/95 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/27/95 | Mann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/27/95 | Mann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/28/95 | Haynes | 1.25 | O | 1.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/28/95 | Nix | 8.00 | S | 0 | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/29/95 | Nix | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/30/95 | Mann | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 06/30/95 | Nix | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/02/95 | Gann | 1.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/03/95 | Haynes | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/05/95 | Mann | 2.25 | O | 2.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/05/95 | Mann | 3.50 | O | 3.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/05/95 | Nix | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/06/95 | Mann | 1.50 | S | .50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/06/95 | Mann | 8.50 | O | 8.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/06/95 | Nix | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/07/95 | Haynes | 6.00 | S | 2.50 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/07/95 | Mann | 8.00 | S | 2.50 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/09/95 | Gann | .50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/09/95 | Gann | .50 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/10/95 | Mann | 10.00 | S | 6.00 | Excessive |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/10/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/10/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/10/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*1272
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/10/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | S | 0 | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/10/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | S | 0 | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/10/95 | Haynes | 1.0 | O | 1.0 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/10/95 | Nix | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/11/95 | Mann | 1.25 | S | .50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/12/95 | Mann | 2.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/14/95 | Nix | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/17/95 | Nix | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/18/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/19/95 | Mann | 5.50 | O | 5.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/21/95 | Nix | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/24/95 | Mann | 1.00 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/26/95 | Mann | 8.00 | S | .75 | Excessive |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/26/95 | Nix | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/27/95 | Mann | 2.00 | S | 0 | Excessive |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/27/95 | Mann | .75 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/27/95 | Nix | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/28/95 | Mann | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/28/95 | Nix | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/31/95 | Mann | 10.00 | S | 4.00 | Excessive |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/31/95 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 07/31/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1273
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/01/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/01/95 | Mann | 42.00 | S | 8.00 | Duplicative/Redundant |
| 08/09/95 | | | | | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/01/95 | Haynes | 92.75 | S | 16.00 | Excessive |
| 08/09/95 | | | | | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/02/95 | Mann | 1.00 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/02/95 | Nix | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/03/95 | Haynes | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/03/95 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/04/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/04/95 | Nix | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/07/95 | Mann | .50 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/07/95 | Gann | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/07/95 | Nix | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/09/95 | Mann | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/14/95 | Gann | 1.80 | O | 1.80 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/14/95 | Nix | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/15/95 | Gann | .60 | O | .60 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/16/95 | Mann | 5.00 | S | 0 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/21/95 | Haynes | 1.25 | | .40 | Excessive-Brumblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/21/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/22/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/23/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/25/95 | Mann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/25/95 | Haynes | .25 | O | .25 | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1274
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/28/95 | Haynes | 9.25 | O | 9.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/28/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/29/95 | Mann | 8.50 | O | 8.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/29/95 | Haynes | 2.25 | O | 2.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 08/31/95 | Mann | 4.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/05/95 | Haynes | 2.25 | | .75 | Unrelated |
| | | | | | Excessive-Brumblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/05/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/05/95 | Gann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/08/95 | Mann | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/11/95 | Haynes | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/11/95 | Mann | 5.00 | S | 2.50 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/11/95 | Gann | 7.00 | O | 7.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/12/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/13/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/14/95 | Mann | 8.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/14/95 | Haynes | .50 | | 0 | Excessive-Brumblow claims |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/15/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/18/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/19/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/19/95 | Gann | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/20/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/21/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/22/95 | Mann | 4.00 | S | 0 | Inadequate Description |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1275
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/22/95 | Haynes | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/25/95 | Gann | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 09/29/95 | Nix | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/02/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/02/95 | Nix | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/03/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/04/95 | Mann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/04/95 | Haynes | 21.00 | S | 0 | Excessive |
| 10/06/95 | | | | | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/04/95 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/04/95 | Gann | 6.30 | O | 6.30 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/04/95 | Gann | .40 | O | .40 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/05/95 | Nix | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/06/95 | Mann | 6.00 | S | 2.50 | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/06/95 | Haynes | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/06/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | S | 0 | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/06/95 | Haynes | .25 | O | .25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/06/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/06/95 | Gann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/06/95 | Nix | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/08/95 | Gann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/09/95 | Mann | 8.25 | O | 8.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/10/95 | Mann | 4.25 | O | 4.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/10/95 | Gann | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/10/95 | Nix | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1276
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/11/95 | Mann | 4.00 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/11/95 | Gann | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/12/95 | Gann | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/12/95 | Gann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/12/95 | Nix | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/13/95 | Mann | 6.00 | S | 2.00 | Duplicative/Redundant |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/13/95 | Nix | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/14/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/14/95 | Gann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/15/95 | Mann | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/15/95 | Gann | 3.50 | O | 3.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/16/95 | Mann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/16/95 | Mann | 8.50 | O | 8.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/16/95 | Haynes | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/16/95 | Gann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/16/95 | Nix | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/17/95 | Mann | 10.50 | O | 10.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/17/95 | Gann | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/18/95 | Mann | 13.00 | O | 13.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/18/95 | Haynes | 4.25 | O | 4.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/18/95 | Haynes | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/18/95 | Gann | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/18/95 | Nix | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/19/95 | Mann | 12.00 | O | 12.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/19/95 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1277
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/19/95 | Nix | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/20/95 | Mann | 12.25 | O | 12.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/20/95 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/20/95 | Haynes | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/20/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/21/95 | Mann | 13.75 | O | 13.75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/21/95 | Haynes | 9.50 | O | 9.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/21/95 | Gann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/22/95 | Mann | 13.00 | O | 13.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/22/95 | Haynes | 9.00 | O | 9.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/22/95 | Haynes | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/22/95 | Nix | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/23/95 | Mann | 9.00 | O | 9.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/23/95 | Haynes | 5.50 | O | 5.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/23/95 | Haynes | 3.50 | O | 3.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/23/95 | Gann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/24/95 | Mann | 9.50 | O | 9.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/24/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/24/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/24/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/24/95 | Haynes | 5.75 | O | 5.75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/24/95 | Haynes | 2.75 | O | 2.75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/24/95 | Nix | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/25/95 | Mann | 11.50 | O | 11.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/25/95 | Haynes | 10.75 | O | 10.75 | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1278
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/25/95 | Nix | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/25/95 | Nix | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/95 | Mann | 9.00 | O | 9.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/95 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/95 | Haynes | 2.00 | O | 2.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/95 | Haynes | 4.25 | O | 4.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/95 | Gann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/95 | Nix | 7.00 | O | 7.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/26/95 | Nix | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/27/95 | Haynes | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/27/95 | Mann | 9.00 | O | 9.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/27/95 | Gann | 8.50 | O | 8.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/27/95 | Nix | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/28/95 | Haynes | 16.00 | O | 16.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/28/95 | Gann | 10.00 | O | 10.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/28/95 | Nix | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/28/95 | Mann | 16.00 | O | 16.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/29/95 | Haynes | 16.00 | O | 16.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/29/95 | Gann | 10.50 | O | 10.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/29/95 | Nix | 7.00 | O | 7.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/30/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/30/95 | Mann | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/30/95 | Haynes | 5.00 | O | 5.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/30/95 | Nix | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/31/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1279
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/31/95 | Mann | 6.00 | O | 6.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/31/95 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/31/95 | Haynes | 5.50 | O | 5.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/31/95 | Gann | 14.00 | O | 14.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 10/31/95 | Nix | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/01/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/01/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/01/95 | Haynes | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/01/95 | Nix | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/02/95 | Mann | 9.50 | O | 9.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/02/95 | Nix | 7.00 | O | 7.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/03/95 | Mann | 8.00 | O | 8.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/04/95 | Mann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/04/95 | Haynes | 2.25 | O | 2.25 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/05/95 | Mann | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/05/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/06/95 | Mann | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/06/95 | Haynes | 1.50 | O | 1.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/06/95 | Haynes | 3.00 | O | 3.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/07/95 | Mann | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/07/95 | Mann | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/07/95 | Haynes | 2.50 | O | 2.50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/08/95 | Mann | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/09/95 | Nix | 3.00 | S | 1.50 | Inadequate Description |
| | | | | | Unrelated/Clerical |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1280
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Entry Date | Attorney | Hours | Ruling | Hours | Reason for Disallowance |
| | | Disputed | | Allowed | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/14/95 | Haynes | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/16/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/16/95 | Haynes | 1.00 | O | 1.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/16/95 | Haynes | 3.50 | S | 0 | Unrelated |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/17/95 | Haynes | .50 | O | .50 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/20/95 | Haynes | .75 | O | .75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/21/95 | Mann | 4.75 | O | 4.75 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/23/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/24/95 | Mann | 4.00 | O | 4.00 | |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/25/95 | Mann | 8.00 | S | 0 | Unrelated/Excessive |
| | | | | | Inadequate Description |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/26/95 | Mann | 2.00 | S | 0 | Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/27/95 | Mann | 10.00 | S | 0 | Unrelated/Excessive |
|------------|----------|----------|--------|---------|-------------------------------|
| 11/28/95 | Mann | 8.00 | S | 0 | Unrelated/Excessive |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1281 Attachment "B"
FEES OF THE CLERK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Amount | Disposition |
|-------------------------------|----------------|---------------------|
| Copies of pleadings | $52.50 | Disallowed |
|-------------------------------|----------------|---------------------|
| Filing fee for cross-appeal | $105.00 | Disallowed |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEES FOR SERVICE OF SUMMONS & COMPLAINT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Item Claimed | Amount | Disposition |
|-------------------------------|----------------|---------------------|
| Filing fee summons & | $120.00 | Allowed |
| complaint | | |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEES OF THE COURT REPORTER
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Amount | Disposition |
|-------------------------------|----------------|---------------------|
| Copy of trial transcript | $891.00 | Allowed |
|-------------------------------|----------------|---------------------|
| Appearance at motion docket | $125.00 | Disallowed |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEES & DISBURSEMENTS FOR PRINTING
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Amount | Disposition |
|-------------------------------|----------------|---------------------|
| Copy of video tape with | $12.50 | Allowed |
| regard to tour of Tyson Food, | | |
| Inc.'s plaint provided to | | |
| Marvin Stewart | | |
|-------------------------------|----------------|---------------------|
| Copying of Dumas | $156.00 | Allowed |
| Investigation File produced | | |
| by Defendant during | | |
| depositions | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*1282
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Total Amount Claimed | Disposition |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------|
| Evidentiary submission to | $204.84 | Disallowed |
| support Motion to Compel | | |
| Deposition Testimony of | | |
| Max Dover | | |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------|
| Binding (Kinko's) for | $16.00 | Disallowed |
| Plaintiff's Motion to Compel | | |
| Don Tyson's Deposition | | |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Evidentiary | $418.82 | Disallowed |
| Submission in Opposition to | | |
| Defendant's Motion for | | |
| Summary Judgment | | |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Objection to | $46.34 | Disallowed |
| Defendant's Motion for | | |
| Summary Judgment | | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEES FOR TRIAL WITNESSES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Total Amount Claimed | Disposition |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------|
| Attendance fees for all | $2898.50 | Allowed |
| witnesses | | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEES FOR EXEMPLIFICATION & COPIES OF PAPERS
NECESSARILY OBTAINED FOR USE IN CASE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Total Amount Claimed | Disposition |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Proposed Rule 26 | $2.40 | Disallowed |
| Disclosure | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's First | $6.40 | Disallowed |
| Interrogatories & Request | | |
| for Production | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response to | $2.40 | Disallowed |
| Defendant's Request for | | |
| Production | | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1283
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Total Amount Claimed | Disposition |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Second Request | $1.60 | Disallowed |
| for Production of Documents | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Third Request for | $2.40 | Disallowed |
| Production of Documents | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion to Compel | $4.80 | Disallowed |
| Production of Documents | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion for | $4.00 | Disallowed |
| Sanctions | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion for Video | $2.40 | Disallowed |
| Inspection | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Fourth Request | $1.60 | Disallowed |
| for Production of Documents | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Second | $1.60 | Disallowed |
| Supplemental Rule 26 | | |
| Disclosure | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Second Motion to | $10.40 | Disallowed |
| Compel & for Sanctions | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Rule 36(b) 5 & 6 | $3.20 | Disallowed |
| Deposition Notice | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Deposition | $6.80 | Disallowed |
| Subpoenas | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Supplemental | $1.60 | Disallowed |
| Rule 26 Disclosure | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Fifth Request for | $1.60 | Disallowed |
| Production of Documents | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion to Compel | $7.20 | Disallowed |
| Bromlow's Answers to | | |
| Interrogatories & Request | | |
| for Production of Documents | | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1284
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Total Amount Claimed | Disposition |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion to Compel | $3.20 | Disallowed |
| Deposition Testimony of | | |
| Max Dover with Exhibit | | |
| attached | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion for | $7.20 | Disallowed |
| Sanctions with Exhibits | | |
| attached | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Answers to | $10.80 | Disallowed |
| Defendant's Interrogatories | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response to | $4.80 | Disallowed |
| Defendant's Motion for | | |
| Order to Enjoin | | |
| Misleading & Harassing | | |
| Communications | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Third Rule 26 | $1.20 | Disallowed |
| Disclosure | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Fourth Rule 26 | $1.20 | Disallowed |
| Disclosure | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Fifth Rule 26 | $1.20 | Disallowed |
| Disclosure | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion to Compel | $7.20 | Disallowed |
| the Deposition of Don Tyson | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Sixth Request for | $3.20 | Disallowed |
| Production of Documents | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion to Compel | $2.40 | Disallowed |
| Deposition of Jimmy | | |
| Bromblow | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1285
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Total Amount Claimed | Disposition |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Objection to | $3.20 | Disallowed |
| Defendant's Motion to | | |
| Quash Deposition Notices to | | |
| Wayne Stutts & Gary Wayne | | |
| Stutts | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Seventh Request | $2.40 | Disallowed |
| for Production of Documents | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response to | $4.00 | Disallowed |
| Defendant's Motion for | | |
| Protective Order Relative to | | |
| Ongoing | | |
| Investigation/Communication | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response to | $3.20 | Disallowed |
| Defendant's Motion for | | |
| Protective Order & to Enjoin | | |
| Disclosure of Confidential | | |
| Matters | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion to Compel | $8.80 | Disallowed |
| Deposition Testimony of | | |
| John Pittard | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Withdrawal of | $4.20 | Disallowed |
| Second Supplemental Rule | | |
| 26 | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Seventh Rule 26 | $5.40 | Disallowed |
| Disclosure | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Eighth Request | $1.20 | Disallowed |
| for Production of Documents | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response to | $36.80 | Disallowed |
| Defendant's Motion to | | |
| Disallow & Motion to Strike | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Proposed Pretrial Order | $7.00 | Allowed |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1286
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Total Amount Claimed | Disposition |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion to Compel | $16.80 | Disallowed |
| Seventh Request for | | |
| Production of Documents | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Objection to | $22.40 | Disallowed |
| Defendant's Motion for | | |
| Summary Judgment | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Disclosure of | $5.40 | Disallowed |
| Expert Witness | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Proposed Exhibit | $20.00 | Allowed |
| List | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Witness List | $10.40 | Allowed |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Objections to | $7.00 | Allowed |
| Exhibit & Witness Lists | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Objections to | $4.00 | Allowed |
| Defendant Bromblow's | | |
| Exhibits | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response in | $12.00 | Disallowed |
| Partial Opposition to | | |
| Defendant's Motion to Bar | | |
| Expert Testimony | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Trial Subpoenas | $15.60 | Disallowed |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response to | $16.80 | Disallowed |
| Defendant's Motion to | | |
| Dismiss | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Objections to | $4.00 | Disallowed |
| Witness/Exhibit Lists re Dr. | | |
| Beverly Thorn | | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1287
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Total Amount Claimed | Disposition |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Supplemental | $17.60 | Disallowed |
| Evidentiary Submission | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion in Limine | $7.20 | Disallowed |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion to Call & | $4.00 | Disallowed |
| Lead Adverse Witnesses | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| 8.5 × 11 Specs 3 Hole | $247.97 | Allowed |
| Punched Tabs 2 Sets of 100 | | |
| Trial Notebooks with all | | |
| exhibits | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Enlarge/Mount Shacoh Bond | $415.37 | Allowed |
| Prints/Dry Mounting | | |
| Foamcore Trial Exhibits | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| 141 30 × 42 Bond Blow-ups | $1187.78 | Allowed |
| Trial Exhibits | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| 15 color exhibits, laminated, | $1171.58 | Allowed |
| Trial Exhibits; 1 set black & | | |
| white copies for exhibits; 3 | | |
| black & white exhibits 30 × | | |
| 42, laminated | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Voir Dire Questions | $5.60 | Allowed |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Shacoh Bond prints, Trial | $128.70 | Allowed |
| Exhibits | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Holt Audio/Visual Video | $286.20 | Allowed |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Drymounting 3 × 16" | $50.40 | Allowed |
| Foamcore, Shacoh Bond | | |
| Prints, Trial Exhibits | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Oversize Aux. Mounting, | $57.02 | Allowed |
| Trial Exhibit | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Objections to | $6.40 | Allowed |
| Tyson's Jury Charges | | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1288
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Total Amount Claimed | Disposition |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Objections to | $2.40 | Allowed |
| Tyson's Special | | |
| Interrogatories | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Proposed Special | $5.60 | Allowed |
| Interrogatories | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Supplemental | $8.00 | Allowed |
| Proposed Jury Instructions | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Proposed Jury | $36.00 | Allowed |
| Instructions | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Trial Exhibits and | $550.00 | $275.00 Allowed |
| Deposition Exhibits | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Objection to | $3.20 | Disallowed |
| Imposition of Statutory Cap | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion for Case | $72.40 | Allowed |
| Expenses with attachments | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Interrogatories & | $2.40 | Allowed |
| Request for Production to | | |
| Defendants' Counsel re | | |
| billable time | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response to | $4.00 | Allowed |
| Tyson's Motion to Alter, | | |
| Amend or Vacate Judgment | | |
| with regard to Sherri Knight | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Objection to | $6.40 | Allowed |
| Tyson's Motion for | | |
| Judgment | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Rule 45 Subpoena Fees to | $90.00 | Allowed |
| Torbert & Torbert and Gilker | | |
| & Jones with regard to | | |
| Discovery on Attorney fees | | |
| and expenses | | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1289
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Total Amount Claimed | Disposition |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion to Hold | $8.80 | Disallowed |
| Don Tyson in Contempt | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Motion to | $9.60 | Disallowed |
| Conduct Discovery on | | |
| Attorney Fee Issue & | | |
| Motion to Compel | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response to | $2.40 | Disallowed |
| Torbert's Objection to | | |
| Subpoena | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response to | $2.40 | Disallowed |
| Tyson's Response to | | |
| Preliminary Injunction | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response to | $2.40 | Disallowed |
| Tyson's Request to | | |
| Investigate Contempt of Don | | |
| Tyson | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response to | $11.20 | Allowed |
| Defendant's Interrogatories | | |
| & Request for Production of | | |
| Documents | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Alicia K. Haynes' Response | $24.00 | Allowed |
| to Defendant's Subpoena | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Larry R. Mann's Response | $5.60 | Allowed |
| to Defendant's Subpoena | | |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|----------------------|
| Plaintiff's Response to | $4.00 | Allowed |
| Tyson's Response to | | |
| Plaintiff's Motion to Engage | | |
| in Discovery | | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*1290
COSTS INCIDENT TO TAKING DEPOSITIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Amount | Disposition |
|-------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------|
| All deposition | $428.50 | Allowed |
| attendance/mileage fees for | | |
| deponents who testified at | | |
| trial | | |
|-------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------|
| Deposition fees for all | $11,045.55 | Allowed |
| deponents who testified at | | |
| trial | | |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER COSTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Items Claimed | Amount | Disposition |
|-------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------|
| Expert Witness Fee | $4577.00 | Disallowed |
|-------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------|
| Mediation Fee | $78.12 | Allowed |
|-------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------|
| Westlaw Research | $155.43 | Disallowed |
|-------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------|
| Costs of Service of | $3155.16 | Allowed |
| Subpoenas | | |
|-------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------|
| U.S. Marshal Fee to Serve | $70.60 | Allowed |
| Injunction on Tyson Foods, | | |
| Inc. | | |
|-------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------|
| Professional Services of | $500.00 | Allowed |
| Mark McKnight, Esq. | | |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL AMOUNT ALLOWED: $23,508.35
FINAL JUDGMENT AWARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS
Based on the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, FINAL JUDGMENT on Plaintiff's application for attorneys' fees and expenses is hereby ENTERED as follows:
1. Alicia Haynes, Esq. shall have and recover of Defendant, in addition to the partial fee previously received, a total of Three Hundred Thirty Eight Thousand Three Hundred Five and 02/100 Dollars ($338,305.02) as a reasonable attorney's fee and prejudgment interest, representing $280,806.18 for her personal services, $7,693.50 for the legal services of Wendy Nix Thornton, and $49,805.34 for the paralegal services of Beth Gann.
2. Larry Mann, Esq. shall have and recover of Defendant, in addition to the partial fee previously received, the sum of One Hundred Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty-Three and 41/100 Dollars ($109,723.41) as a reasonable attorney's fee and prejudgment interest.
*1291 3. Elizabeth Jones, Esq. shall have and recover of Defendant the sum of Twenty-eight Thousand Three Hundred Seven and 50/100 Dollars ($28,307.50) as a reasonable attorney's fee and prejudgment interest.
4. Plaintiff shall have and recover of Defendant the sum of Twenty-three Thousand Five Hundred Eight and 35/100 Dollars ($23,508.35) as reimbursement for her costs reasonably and necessarily incurred in the litigation of this case.
Related
Tillman v. Hammond's Transportation, LLC
E.D. Louisiana, 2021
Kenny Davis v. Lt. James Locke and Lt. Gemelli
936 F.2d 1208 (Eleventh Circuit, 1991)
Dumas v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
139 F. Supp. 2d 1243 (N.D. Alabama, 2001)
Brown v. Stackler
612 F.2d 1057 (Seventh Circuit, 1980)
Lewis v. Kendrick
944 F.2d 949 (First Circuit, 1991)
Fair Housing Council of Greater Washington v. Landow
999 F.2d 92 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
139 F. Supp. 2d 1243, 2001 WL 363359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dumas-v-tyson-foods-inc-alnd-2001.