Duhon v. Saloom
This text of 325 So. 2d 794 (Duhon v. Saloom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Valliet DUHON
v.
Richard G. SALOOM and Michael E. Boustany.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
DIXON, J., is of the opinion the Court of Appeal has misinterpreted Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La. 1080, 262 So.2d 328 and the factual issue on the *795 plea of prescription should have been submitted to the jury.
CALOGERO, J., is of the opinion this writ should be granted.
DENNIS, J., is of the view that writ should be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 So. 2d 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duhon-v-saloom-la-1976.