Duhon v. Saloom
325 So. 2d 794
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Duhon v. Saloom. Read the opinion of the Court — 1976 La. LEXIS 4766 →
Opinion
Valliet DUHON
v.
Richard G. SALOOM and Michael E. Boustany.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
DIXON, J., is of the opinion the Court of Appeal has misinterpreted Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La. 1080, 262 So.2d 328 and the factual issue on the *795 plea of prescription should have been submitted to the jury.
CALOGERO, J., is of the opinion this writ should be granted.
DENNIS, J., is of the view that writ should be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duhon v. Saloom, 325 So. 2d 794 (La. 1976).
325 So. 2d 794 (Duhon v. Saloom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co.
262 So. 2d 328 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)
Duhon v. Saloom
325 So. 2d 794 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)