Ducote v. Union Pacific Railroad

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Ducote v. Union Pacific Railroad

4 So. 3d 247, 8 La.App. 3 Cir. 1001, 2009 La. App. LEXIS 154, 2009 WL 249395

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 4, 2009

DocketNo. 08-1001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 So. 3d 247 (Ducote v. Union Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ducote v. Union Pacific Railroad, 4 So. 3d 247, 8 La.App. 3 Cir. 1001, 2009 La. App. LEXIS 154, 2009 WL 249395 (La. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Ducote v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 08-1208 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/4/09), 4 So.3d 240, the DOTD’s writ application is granted in part and denied in part. We grant the writ on the issue of motion to strike unauthenticated documents. The writ application requesting a summary judgment is denied, but we affirm the trial court’s ruling recognizing and granting an exception of no cause of action in favor of the DOTD. We dismiss with prejudice the DOTD from this lawsuit. Costs are assessed to the defendant, Union Pacific Railroad Company.

WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND MADE PEREMPTORY; WRIT DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Ducote v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 08-1208 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/4/09), 4 So.3d 240, the DOTD’s writ application is granted in part and denied in part. We grant the writ on the issue of motion to strike unauthenticated documents. The writ application requesting a summary judgment is denied, but we affirm the trial court’s ruling recognizing and granting an exception of no cause of action in favor of the DOTD. We dismiss with prejudice the DOTD from this lawsuit. Costs are assessed to the defendant, Union Pacific Railroad Company.

WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND MADE PEREMPTORY; WRIT DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 So. 3d 247, 8 La.App. 3 Cir. 1001, 2009 La. App. LEXIS 154, 2009 WL 249395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ducote-v-union-pacific-railroad-lactapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack