Dubreuil v. Witt
This text of 845 A.2d 407 (Dubreuil v. Witt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 410 (AC 23915), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, in a legal malpractice action tried to the court, the plaintiff need not present expert testimony regarding the defendant’s breach of the standard of care because the court is aware of the standard of care and of what constitutes a breach of that standard?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
845 A.2d 407, 268 Conn. 903, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dubreuil-v-witt-conn-2004.