Dubreuil v. Witt

845 A.2d 407, 268 Conn. 903, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 97
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 1, 2004
DocketSC 17143
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 845 A.2d 407 (Dubreuil v. Witt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dubreuil v. Witt, 845 A.2d 407, 268 Conn. 903, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 97 (Colo. 2004).

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 410 (AC 23915), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, in a legal malpractice action tried to the court, the plaintiff need not present expert testimony regarding the defendant’s breach of the standard of care because the court is aware of the standard of care and of what constitutes a breach of that standard?”

[904]*904Decided March 1, 2004 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17143. Otto P. Witt, pro se, in support of the petition. Joseph X. Du Mond, Jr., in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dubreuil v. Witt
860 A.2d 698 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
845 A.2d 407, 268 Conn. 903, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dubreuil-v-witt-conn-2004.