Dubreuil v. Witt
845 A.2d 407, 268 Conn. 903, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 97
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 410 (AC 23915), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, in a legal malpractice action tried to the court, the plaintiff need not present expert testimony regarding the defendant’s breach of the standard of care because the court is aware of the standard of care and of what constitutes a breach of that standard?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dubreuil v. Witt, 845 A.2d 407, 268 Conn. 903, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 97 (Colo. 2004).
845 A.2d 407 (Dubreuil v. Witt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dubreuil v. Witt
860 A.2d 698 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)