DRFP LLC v. Republica Bolivariana

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 22, 2018
Docket16-3960
StatusUnpublished

This text of DRFP LLC v. Republica Bolivariana (DRFP LLC v. Republica Bolivariana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DRFP LLC v. Republica Bolivariana, (6th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 18a0038n.06

Case No. 16-3960

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Jan 22, 2018 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk DRFP L.L.C., dba Skye Ventures, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED v. ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ) THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF REPÚBLICA BOLIVARIANA DE ) OHIO VENEZUELA; THE VENEZUELAN ) MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ) ) Defendants-Appellees. )

ORDER

BEFORE: COOK, KETHLEDGE, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

COOK, Circuit Judge. When we affirmed the district court’s judgment against DRFP

L.L.C., dba Skye Ventures (“Skye”), we invited the República Bolivariana de Venezuela and the

Venezuelan Ministry of Finance (collectively, “Venezuela”) to seek attorneys’ fees and costs

associated with this appeal. DRFP L.L.C. v. República Bolivariana de Venezuela, 706 F. App’x

269, 279–80 (6th Cir. 2017). Venezuela did just that. There followed an opposition from Skye,

a submission of unredacted invoices by Venezuela, and one more round of briefing from the

parties.

We have reviewed the parties’ submissions and conclude that Skye’s appeal was

frivolous. As we explained previously, Skye “advanced arguments untethered to valid analysis Case No. 16-3960, DRFP v. República Bolivariana de Venezuela, et al.

of either Ohio or Venezuelan law.” Id. at 280. And what’s more, this appeal stemmed from

Skye’s “buy[ing] (for pennies on the dollar) notes that were obviously fraudulent, and then for

twelve years [taking] a flier on enforcing them in federal court.” Id. (Kethledge, J., concurring).

We therefore GRANT Venezuela’s motion for attorneys’ fees. Pursuant to Federal Rule

of Appellate Procedure 38, we may “award just damages and single or double costs to”

Venezuela. Venezuela seeks over $750,000 in attorneys’ fees; challenging that calculation, Skye

contends that any award should not exceed $35,000. We deem an award of $100,000 to be

reasonable in light of Rule 38’s purposes.

Accordingly, we ORDER Skye to pay Venezuela $100,000 for attorneys’ fees incurred

in this appeal. Skye and its counsel shall be jointly and severally liable to Venezuela for the

entire award. See 28 U.S.C. § 1927; see also, e.g., Shaya v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,

489 F. App’x 815, 820 (6th Cir. 2012); Raft v. C.I.R., 147 F. App’x 458, 463 (6th Cir. 2005).

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Karmon Shaya v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
489 F. App'x 815 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
Raft v. Commissioner
147 F. App'x 458 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
DRFP L.L.C. v. República Bolivariana De Venezuela
706 F. App'x 269 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
DRFP LLC v. Republica Bolivariana, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drfp-llc-v-republica-bolivariana-ca6-2018.