D.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.R. v. State

789 So. 2d 535, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10191, 2001 WL 821825

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 20, 2001

DocketNo. 1D00-4249

StatusPublished

This text of 789 So. 2d 535 (D.R. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D.R. v. State, 789 So. 2d 535, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10191, 2001 WL 821825 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

D.R. appeals two juvenile disposition orders in which he was adjudicated delinquent for violating an injunction for protection against repeat violence. The evidence was insufficient to establish that he violated the injunction in a way pro[536]*536scribed by section 784.047, Florida Statutes (2000). Accordingly, D.R.’s motion for judgment of dismissal should have been granted, and we REVERSE the disposition orders and REMAND.

MINER, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ„ CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

D.R. appeals two juvenile disposition orders in which he was adjudicated delinquent for violating an injunction for protection against repeat violence. The evidence was insufficient to establish that he violated the injunction in a way pro[536]*536scribed by section 784.047, Florida Statutes (2000). Accordingly, D.R.’s motion for judgment of dismissal should have been granted, and we REVERSE the disposition orders and REMAND.

MINER, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ„ CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

789 So. 2d 535, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10191, 2001 WL 821825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dr-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.