Dow v. United States

81 F. 1004, 27 C.C.A. 42, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1932
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 21, 1897·No. No. 922·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the defendant in error for a writ of certiorari to the court below for the purpose of perfecting the record herein is denied, (1) because it does not appear from the moving papers that the portions of the evidence which the defendant in error seeks to have returned to this court form a part of the bill of exceptions in the case; (2) because it appears from the motion papers.that the absence of the evidence can be of no disadvantage to the defendant in error, since it seeks to sustain the ruling of the court admitting the evidence', which is omitted, and submitting the ease to the jury, and the apxieliate court will presume that the ruling of the trial court upon these questions was rigid, unless the evidence admitted by its ruling ai>pears in the printed record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dow v. United States, 81 F. 1004, 27 C.C.A. 42, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1932 (8th Cir. 1897).

81 F. 1004 (Dow v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W. S. Gray Cotton Mills v. Spartanburg County Mills
137 S.E. 684 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1927)
Rand v. Morse
289 F. 339 (Eighth Circuit, 1923)
Graham v. Standard Fire Ins. Co.
112 S.E. 88 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)
Lewin v. Telluride Iron Works Co.
272 F. 590 (Eighth Circuit, 1921)
Cruse v. Gau
193 S.W. 405 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Majestic Life Assurance Co. v. Tuttle
107 N.E. 22 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1914)
Shedd v. American Credit Indemnity Co.
95 N.E. 316 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1911)
Marquette County Savings Bank v. Koivisto
127 N.W. 680 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)
Luckett-Wake Tobacco Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins.
171 F. 147 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky, 1908)
Hampton Stave Co. v. Gardner
154 F. 805 (Eighth Circuit, 1907)
Connecticut Fire Ins. v. Buchanan
141 F. 877 (Eighth Circuit, 1905)
Williams v. Neely
134 F. 1 (Eighth Circuit, 1904)
Modern Woodmen v. Tevis
117 F. 369 (Eighth Circuit, 1902)
Kehm v. German Mutual Insurance
8 Ohio N.P. 542 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County, 1901)
Rice v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
103 F. 427 (Eighth Circuit, 1900)
Bell v. Eddy
51 S.W. 959 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1899)
United Firemen's Ins. v. Thomas
92 F. 127 (Seventh Circuit, 1899)
Burnham v. Interstate Casualty Co.
75 N.W. 445 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)