W. S. Gray Cotton Mills v. Spartanburg County Mills
137 S.E. 684, 139 S.C. 223, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 151
Opinions
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
We are entirely satisfied with the decree of his Honor, Judge M. L. Bonham. Let the decree be reported. Therefore, for the reasons stated by his Honor in the circuit decree, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
W. S. Gray Cotton Mills v. Spartanburg County Mills, 137 S.E. 684, 139 S.C. 223, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 151 (S.C. 1927).
137 S.E. 684 (W. S. Gray Cotton Mills v. Spartanburg County Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hansen v. DHL LABORATORIES, INC.
459 S.E.2d 850 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1995)
Mooney v. James
343 S.E.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1986)
Carter v. Associated Petroleum Carriers
110 S.E.2d 8 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1959)
Farr v. Williams
101 S.E.2d 483 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1957)
Davenport v. Miller
61 S.E.2d 534 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1950)
Caldwell v. Boedeker
1947 OK 361 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1947)
Cit. Bk. of Darlington v. McDonald
24 S.E.2d 369 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1943)
Dowd v. Dowd
115 P.2d 409 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1941)
Ham v. Mullins Lumber Co.
7 S.E.2d 712 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1940)