Dow v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Dow v. United States

81 F. 1004, 27 C.C.A. 42, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1932

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 21, 1897

DocketNo. 922

StatusPublished

Cited by19 cases

This text of 81 F. 1004 (Dow v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dow v. United States, 81 F. 1004, 27 C.C.A. 42, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1932 (8th Cir. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the defendant in error for a writ of certiorari to the court below for the purpose of perfecting the record herein is denied, (1) because it does not appear from the moving papers that the portions of the evidence which the defendant in error seeks to have returned to this court form a part of the bill of exceptions in the case; (2) because it appears from the motion papers.that the absence of the evidence can be of no disadvantage to the defendant in error, since it seeks to sustain the ruling of the court admitting the evidence', which is omitted, and submitting the ease to the jury, and the apxieliate court will presume that the ruling of the trial court upon these questions was rigid, unless the evidence admitted by its ruling ai>pears in the printed record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the defendant in error for a writ of certiorari to the court below for the purpose of perfecting the record herein is denied, (1) because it does not appear from the moving papers that the portions of the evidence which the defendant in error seeks to have returned to this court form a part of the bill of exceptions in the case; (2) because it appears from the motion papers.that the absence of the evidence can be of no disadvantage to the defendant in error, since it seeks to sustain the ruling of the court admitting the evidence', which is omitted, and submitting the ease to the jury, and the apxieliate court will presume that the ruling of the trial court upon these questions was rigid, unless the evidence admitted by its ruling ai>pears in the printed record.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 F. 1004, 27 C.C.A. 42, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dow-v-united-states-ca8-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack